- Jan 14, 2009
- 1,931
- 119
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
This is not about gays, which will probably disappoint many people around here for whom the whole gay thing is the end all and be all of life. I made a point somewhere else where the subject was physician assisted suicide that I was of the mindset that a person who wants to die and who uses the physician assisted method is simply a coward because they want to die but they are too chicken to do it themselves.
I also made a point regarding Ken Lay. For those of you who have been living under a rock the last decade, Ken Lay was the CEO of Enron and he stole millions from the company. He was convicted of his crimes. Normally under federal jurisprudence, the money that he embezzled would have been subject to redistribution through the judicial process. Lay instead decided to deed it to his family and commit suicide. No matter what you think of Lay or what he did, I feel that his final act shows an amount of courage and honor. It was not as if he was going to be in a position to enjoy the money but by taking his own life he ensured for the welfare of his family and he ensured that they were not going to suffer for his crimes, even if you would argue that they are no more deserving of the money.
I also bring this up because in the aftermath of the failed assassination attempt on Hitler in 1944, in which Rommel took part in, they gave Rommel the choice of taking his own life, in large part because they did not want to have to desecrate the memory of the most popular man in Germany. Rommel chose to commit suicide to protect the honor of his family rather than be subjected to a Nazi execution.
Throughout history there have been examples where people have committed suicide more for their personal honor, or to protect their family and the assets thereof, than out of a selfish desire to escape the world.
So basically, what I want to discuss here, as a nice way of diverting away from the gay thing, is the myriad of ethical questions that surround the act of suicide.
I also made a point regarding Ken Lay. For those of you who have been living under a rock the last decade, Ken Lay was the CEO of Enron and he stole millions from the company. He was convicted of his crimes. Normally under federal jurisprudence, the money that he embezzled would have been subject to redistribution through the judicial process. Lay instead decided to deed it to his family and commit suicide. No matter what you think of Lay or what he did, I feel that his final act shows an amount of courage and honor. It was not as if he was going to be in a position to enjoy the money but by taking his own life he ensured for the welfare of his family and he ensured that they were not going to suffer for his crimes, even if you would argue that they are no more deserving of the money.
I also bring this up because in the aftermath of the failed assassination attempt on Hitler in 1944, in which Rommel took part in, they gave Rommel the choice of taking his own life, in large part because they did not want to have to desecrate the memory of the most popular man in Germany. Rommel chose to commit suicide to protect the honor of his family rather than be subjected to a Nazi execution.
Throughout history there have been examples where people have committed suicide more for their personal honor, or to protect their family and the assets thereof, than out of a selfish desire to escape the world.
So basically, what I want to discuss here, as a nice way of diverting away from the gay thing, is the myriad of ethical questions that surround the act of suicide.
