justlookinla
Regular Member
When you take a stand against killing innocent unborn babies you may have a right to talk about harm.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wrong. My concern is how certain Christians, and far from most, oppose reality and attempt to harm others through public schools and other venues.
And of course I can help you with understanding the Bible. Your main flaw is in assuming that it is literally true. That will almost always lead to false spirituality.[/QUOTE
It's impossible for you, yielding to the antichrist spirit, to teach biblical truths consistently. You're deceived by this spirit and are apparently unaware of it.
We have gone over this more than once. If you use improper terms it makes it almost impossible to debate a subject. I have never advocated killing innocent babies, but I can show where the Bible advocates for that practice.When you take a stand against killing innocent unborn babies you may have a right to talk about harm.
We have gone over this more than once. If you use improper terms it makes it almost impossible to debate a subject. I have never advocated killing innocent babies, but I can show where the Bible advocates for that practice.
I have condemned killing babies. We have not discussed other matters because you insist on using loaded terminology.First, you still haven't condemned the practice. Secondly, you don't have a clue on how to interpret the bible...antichrist spirit and all.
I have condemned killing babies. We have not discussed other matters because you insist on using loaded terminology.
And of course I can interpret the Bible better than you can. I don't have your multiple handicaps.
Innocent unborn babies?
It's impossible for the antichrist spirit to accurately interpret the bible. Your interpretation would be a perversion of the Word.
No such animal. Try again.
That obviously does not apply to me since I am not "antichirst".
Lewis's TrilemmaIf someone thinks I presented God as a lunatic, I'd be interested in seeing their reason for the accusation.
Influenced by the antichrist spirit....get it right. Now, do you deny the Father and the Son?
In the world of the Godless.
Sure, you can believe that. You know NOTHING about genetics, a field currently approaching the infant stage.And that means what?..... Absolutely nothing?
Wrong again. In the real world, by definition a baby is not a baby until after it is born. I did not come up with this definition. Once again if you use loaded
Influenced by the antichrist spirit....get it right. Now, do you deny the Father and the Son?
No, let's get rid of this first false claim of yours. If you want to make such a claim you need to show massive evidence that supports it.
You are just using guesses and suppositions again.
The results would be rather obvious. The early books of the Bible would show all of the hallmarks of what one would expect if they were cobbled together from multiple sources,..
Wrong again. In the real world, by definition a baby is not a baby until after it is born. I did not come up with this definition. Once again if you use loaded
Which implies of course that it is simply a made up book. We do agree!Biblical scholars agree! Glad we got that out of the way.
You have to learn when someone is speaking colloquially. I will not discuss this topic with justlook when he uses loaded and dishonest terminology.The ultrasound can be used during pregnancy to show images of the baby, amniotic sac, placenta, and ovaries. Major anatomical abnormalities or birth defects are visible on an ultrasound.
http://www.webmd.com/baby/ultrasound
Definition
By Mayo Clinic Staff
- A fetal ultrasound, or sonogram, is an imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to produce images of a baby in the uterus.
The first question I'd ask is, why is this person wishing to prove the bible wrong? What spirit is influencing them to do that? What is their motive?
There's nothing in the bible wrong so it's really a moot question. Worthless, really.
Not that I believe in Noah's Ark (nor disbelieve, mind you), but the question you have asked has an easily-guessed possible answer.
Imagine, for example, that there were two of each animal on Earth on an Ark to save them from floods (7 of the clean versions, obviously) then whatever genetic variation goes onto the Ark will be the genetic variation that comes off of the ark.
To wit, if the cheetahs who went onto the Ark were cousins, then the genetic variability of subsequent generations of cheetahs will be substantially less than that of subsequent generations of other creatures whose forebears were more genetically diverse.
About the Flood:Give an example of where I've portrayed God as a lunatic.
God had a plan, and the plan worked.
God blatantly kills David's child to punish him in the bible. It isn't a matter of interpretation when something is stated so directly.First, you still haven't condemned the practice. Secondly, you don't have a clue on how to interpret the bible...antichrist spirit and all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?