Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And that means what?..... Absolutely nothing?The field of molecular genetics is not yet out of the baby nursery. My mom is older. I've been to a house that's older. I have aspirin in my medicine cabinet that may be older.
You call Christianity "magic" which has occult connotations. You constantly promote your antichrist viewpoint of creation.
I'd say that the admins have been very lenient with you.
There's nothing "in the bible wrong"? Besides being bad English, of course there are errors and mistakes in the Bible. Let's forget about the bad science for now. And the bad geography. How about the bad morals? I thought that we agreed that it is immoral to kill babies? The Bible does not say so. I would hope that you think that slavery is immoral. The Bible does not say so. The Bible supports life long slavery. You can even abuse your slaves severely and it is still okay with the Bible.The first question I'd ask is, why is this person wishing to prove the bible wrong? What spirit is influencing them to do that? What is their motive?
There's nothing in the bible wrong so it's really a moot question. Worthless, really.
That's the way YOU portray him. If you' re unhappy about that, blame yourself.Why would you call the christian God a lunatic?
Unfortunately the bible was already changed, the stories of Gilgamesh came first, the life of Jesus is virtually an exact copy of the life of Gilgamesh who lived a thousand years before Jesus, everything you associate with Jesus happened to Gilgamesh first. (lot's of other people as well) Read about Gilgamesh and see for yourself.
The stories of Gilgamesh did not change the bible.
When have I ever done so? You have it backwards as usual, you give a false high level to humanity.
Wrong again, there may be an "antirejectionofreality" spirit in my posts. You are opposed to reality.[/ingOUOTE]
No, there's a definite underlying antichrist spirit.
If your claim is true you should be able to support it with links. I can support my claims. Amateurs often do not know what they are actually observing.
I can support it with many years of observing flood waters rise and recede. Your denial of the fact is simply
an indication of your lack of real world experience.
Nope, once again you have failed utterly. All you have done is to illustrate your bias against reality. And you have barely scratched the surface of this problem. Let's run over your failures so far. Floods do not produce meanders. You made a bogus claim "I have seen it". That is worthless in a debate. I gave you a link with a very simple explanation of how meanders forms that I hoped was simple enough for you to understand. Either you did not read it or you did not understand it. Floods at best will form a braided stream. That was not a braided stream. You can admit defeat and bow out if you like. Or you could not admit defeat and bow out. You have not even come close to winning.
Place the photo before you and conjure whatever conclusion you (with extreme bias) desire. I'm sure it helps you embrace your faith-based creationist views.
There's nothing "in the bible wrong"? Besides being bad English, of course there are errors and mistakes in the Bible. Let's forget about the bad science for now. And the bad geography. How about the bad morals? I thought that we agreed that it is immoral to kill babies? The Bible does not say so. I would hope that you think that slavery is immoral. The Bible does not say so. The Bible supports life long slavery. You can even abuse your slaves severely and it is still okay with the Bible.
That's the way YOU portray him. If you' re unhappy about that, blame yourself.
The Bible is a retelling of many of the stories in the Enuma Elish.
Do you really think that's an accusation worth pursuing?Give an example of where I've portrayed God as a lunatic.
I don't see the problem. This didn't happen.So here's the problem.
If almost every mammalian species on earth was culled down to 2 members a mere 4000 years ago, why does only the Cheetah (and the southern elephant seal, and a handful of others) show this sort of lack of diversity?
Wrong, I was pointing out your errors. You have yet to shown how I ever "devalued humanity". This weak reply of yours shows that even you know that you are wrong.Do you think about what you post? You claim to not devalue humanity and then post "you give a false high level to humanity". Nuff said.
Please, don't be silly. The fact that I can show that your beliefs are not only errant,but comically wrong only disproves your version of "God". It does not disprove the Christian God at all and is hardly "antichrist".Your antichrist spirit is once again rearing it's ugly head. The antichrist spirit cannot honestly discuss the things of God without perverting it.
Jack Daniels or Mogen David?On a related note, humans likely went through a bottleneck some time between 70,000 and 100,000 years ago.
The bible is a mish-mash of all the stories that came before, bits taken from here, there and everywhere, there is nothing in the bible (old or new testaments) that was not taken from previous stories from all over the middle east especially about Jesus and his life.The stories of Gilgamesh did not change the bible.
Why don't rewriters add a 67th book with Mohammad in It then?The bible is a mish-mash of all the stories that came before, bits taken from here, there and everywhere, there is nothing in the bible (old or new testaments) that was not taken from previous stories from all over the middle east especially about Jesus and his life.
One could put the Bible to a "scientific test". One could make hypotheses on what we would observe if the Bible was correct and what we would expect to observe if the at least the earliest books of the Bible were derived from other religious texts. I don't think too many of the creationists would be happy with the results of testing such hypotheses.The bible is a mish-mash of all the stories that came before, bits taken from here, there and everywhere, there is nothing in the bible (old or new testaments) that was not taken from previous stories from all over the middle east especially about Jesus and his life.
Different sects and religions have "closed" the Bible at different times. The Jews closed theirs first, most Christians closed theirs in the second century CE, the Muslims closed theirs later, and Mormons later yet.Why don't rewriters add a 67th book with Mohammad in It then?
If the Bible is so open-ended, why isn't It still being written?
In fact, where are the books on Darwin and Linnaeus?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?