• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Noah in New Jersey

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes
J

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,338
7,533
31
Wales
✟436,076.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single

What you believe is not superior to what the facts actually show.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,300
52,680
Guam
✟5,164,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
TLK Valentine said:
You understand wrongly, as usual.

Sounds more like you're trying to redefine words to suit yourself -- "King James' English" doesn't mean squat when it disagrees with you, does it?
Click to expand...
Why?

Are you one of those who believe(d) in a pre-Adamic race?
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
AV1611VET said:
Why?

Are you one of those who believe(d) in a pre-Adamic race?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant -- why do you attempt to redefine King James' English?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,300
52,680
Guam
✟5,164,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
TLK Valentine said:
Irrelevant -- why do you attempt to redefine King James' English?
Click to expand...
The only way "replenish" can be interpreted to mean "fill up again" in Genesis 1 is if you believe in a pre-Adamic race.

Something I assume you did at one time.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,300
52,680
Guam
✟5,164,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Valentine, if you believed in a pre-Adamic race, why did you say this?

TLK Valentine said:
"Replenish...." that's an interesting word,
Click to expand...

Why would you find it 'an interesting word'?

Was it to try and confuse me?

And if you didn't believe in a pre-Adamic race, why are you talking like there was?
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟95,346.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
AV1611VET said:
The only way "replenish" can be interpreted to mean "fill up again" in Genesis 1 is if you believe in a pre-Adamic race.

Something I assume you did at one time.
Click to expand...
If that's the plain meaning of what you view as the one true perfect version of the bible, wouldn't you need to hold that view yourself?

What happened to "the bible says it, that settles it"?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,300
52,680
Guam
✟5,164,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
[serious] said:
If that's the plain meaning of what you view as the one true perfect version of the bible, wouldn't you need to hold that view yourself?

What happened to "the bible says it, that settles it"?
Click to expand...
I explained my view on "replenish."
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟95,346.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
AV1611VET said:
The "plain meaning," as you call it, contradicts Genesis 1.
Click to expand...
Um, "replenish the earth" is part of Gen 1.

But if the plain meaning of Genesis 1 is self contradictory, then the plain meaning must, as you are fond of saying, take a hike.

This opens the door to day/age interpretations, pre adam civilizations, etc.

Your insistence on which section of Gen 1 to not take literally is thus not biblical, but based on either personal preference or human tradition.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,300
52,680
Guam
✟5,164,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Take it up with Google please.

I've wasted enough time with unanswered questions.

You're smart enough to stop just shy of exposing yourself.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
AV1611VET said:
The only way "replenish" can be interpreted to mean "fill up again" in Genesis 1 is if you believe in a pre-Adamic race.

Something I assume you did at one time.
Click to expand...

What I or you believe is irrelevant -- what did the Jews believe? They're the ones who wrote it...
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
AV1611VET said:
Valentine, if you believed in a pre-Adamic race, why did you say this?



Why would you find it 'an interesting word'?

Was it to try and confuse me?

And if you didn't believe in a pre-Adamic race, why are you talking like there was?
Click to expand...

As mentioned, what I or you believe is irrelevant -- we didn't use that word.

Perhaps King James believed in a pre-Adamic race?
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟95,346.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
AV1611VET said:
Take it up with Google please.

I've wasted enough time with unanswered questions.

You're smart enough to stop just shy of exposing yourself.
Click to expand...
I'm not hiding anything. If there is some component you think I'm implying but not stating, it is not my intent. If you'd like me to unambiguously state something I will, or I'll explicitly reject it if it is not what I'm saying.

EDIT: perhaps you are thinking of your questions to others regarding their view of people before Adam. You never asked me so I never thought to answer, but in the interest of clarity, I reject the idea that there was any such sharp bottleneck within the past 6000 years as inconsistent with what we can observe today. As such, Adam must be one of the following:
1. metaphorical
2. far earlier that 6000 years
3. one of many people alive at the time.

As for which of these is the case, I lean towards #1, but don't have any issue with the other two. I consider it a disputable matter and not theologically important.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Living by faith, not by sight
Replies
2
Views
358
Daily Devotionals
joechristianwarrior
What are your favorite 'interactive' small group bible study series? (printed)
Replies
0
Views
224
Christian Philosophy & Ethics
zelosravioli
But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming (Greek: Parousia = PRESENCE) of the Son of man be....
Replies
1
Views
257
Exposition & Bible Study
BobRyan
Is 'once saved always saved' a biblical teaching?
Replies
105
Views
3K
General Theology
Dan Perez
D
I tell you, in that night there shall be two in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left...
Replies
1
Views
272
Exposition & Bible Study
Spiritual Jew
S
Menu
Log in
Register