Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
New vax science shows mandates unwise
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="whatbogsends" data-source="post: 76356322" data-attributes="member: 11978"><p>The data regarding actual infection rates is skewed because the unvaccinated are often required to test when the vaccinated aren't.</p><p></p><p>The study referenced showed actual infection rate to be only 1/3 less (25% vs 38%), while ongoing transmission rate to be roughly even (23% vs 25%). Other studies have shown fairly low rates of protection from infection (generally between 40-60%) - nothing like "factor of 5" which you're claiming.</p><p></p><p>As far as behavior goes, when you paint with a broad brush, you don't show much detail. Instead of focusing on "the unvaccinated" that are extending the pandemic, the focus should be on those who engage in large, prolonged, indoor gatherings, at which the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike are spreading the virus and increasing the probability of future variants.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="whatbogsends, post: 76356322, member: 11978"] The data regarding actual infection rates is skewed because the unvaccinated are often required to test when the vaccinated aren't. The study referenced showed actual infection rate to be only 1/3 less (25% vs 38%), while ongoing transmission rate to be roughly even (23% vs 25%). Other studies have shown fairly low rates of protection from infection (generally between 40-60%) - nothing like "factor of 5" which you're claiming. As far as behavior goes, when you paint with a broad brush, you don't show much detail. Instead of focusing on "the unvaccinated" that are extending the pandemic, the focus should be on those who engage in large, prolonged, indoor gatherings, at which the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike are spreading the virus and increasing the probability of future variants. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
New vax science shows mandates unwise
Top
Bottom