• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

New King James Version Debate Blog

Nazaroo

Joseph is still alive! (Gen 45.26)
Dec 5, 2005
2,626
68
clinging to Jesus sandalstrap
✟25,730.00
Faith
Christian
It seems that there are 2 questions here.
1. Is the KJ the only proper bible?
2. Are the Byzantine manuscripts the most accurate to the originals?

I'd answer "NO" to the first question, and "probably yes" to the second question.

I agree with you there.

peace
Nazaroo
 
Upvote 0

heritage36

Newbie
Jun 2, 2010
433
12
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
✟30,618.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Is this about the whole KJV only debate? If so, I always find those postings entertaining. I do feel we owe a great debt to the KJV for paving the road for english Bibles, but if it really was perfect or flawless, why was a new KJV Bible made? I question when someone authorizes a version as being inspired too, and then feels the need to plug his own name in a few times even though its a blatant mistranslation of the name.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Dave

God Save The Queen!
Apr 2, 2010
7,223
762
Sheffield
✟40,710.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
tell me this please. why are there 6 differant hebrew words, all with distinct meaning, that are all translated as stranger?

Different languages have different numbers of words for different things. Hebrew especially is very different and works in a different way to English.
If I was translating into French and had an English text which had the words "thank-you, thanks, cheers, ta" these would all be rendered as 'merci'. Perhaps the Hebrew has slightly different connotations that there just isn't an English equivalent of. Could you let me know which words they are/which verses they are in?
 
Upvote 0

Nazaroo

Joseph is still alive! (Gen 45.26)
Dec 5, 2005
2,626
68
clinging to Jesus sandalstrap
✟25,730.00
Faith
Christian
I question when someone authorizes a version as being inspired too, and then feels the need to plug his own name in a few times even though its a blatant mistranslation of the name.

He was born a king. That is ultimately nothing, as even the Emperor of Babylon found out.

Its what you do with what God gives you that matters.

King James stepped up and permitted, authorized, and paid for a new, clear and noble translation for the English speaking peoples of his nation.

One needs to remember the context, in which the Medieval church had persecuted people for 300 years and had burned people alive for daring to translate the New Testament into a readable and understandable language, because they did not want ordinary people to find out what was in the Bible texts.

Against this background, when even those in authority in his own English church were not necessarily happy with giving people the power to read and interpret for themselves the Bible, that James did the right thing when it counted, and allowed a sensible, skilled and reverent translation to be made.

The task was ultimately done so well, that no other English translation has been able to supplant the KJV for nearly 400 years.

The fact that after all this time the language needs updating is no shame upon the Godly men who made the translation in 1611, and those who cared and protected that work by periodically updating the language, so that it would remain the centerpiece of British culture and literacy that it obviously is.

It was called the Authorized Version in James' lifetime, not "the King James version", which is a more modern name.

James the name is just an Anglicized version of "Jacob", but perhaps it should have been left "Jacob" in various places in the text. However, historically, almost all the names in the Bible have been 'translated' in an Anglicized fashion to help English readers become familiar with the text without being distracted by strange and foreign-sounding names.

Almost all other English translations adopt the same Anglicized names, so this is hardly a fault of the KJV, as though this translation was doing something different than everyone else.



peace
Nazaroo
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Dave
Upvote 0