Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
New interview with Pentagon whistleblower
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KomissarSteve" data-source="post: 32434241" data-attributes="member: 176996"><p>And what if it caucuses with the GOP and splits with its party on the most important issue of the day? What then would we call it?</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>And why, pray tell, should I take any of these organizations' word for it? Why shouldn't his actions speak for themselves?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I've already explained to you, campaigning.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>I'm not entirely sure why I should care a word about what the ACU says..."least conservative" does not mean "most liberal."</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>No - only implying it strongly enough that I may as well have.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Ah, good - only one conclusion. Never mind that it's the <em>central conclusion to both articles.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p><em>Again</em>, as I've already explained to you, the opinions of the Kurdish politicians do not accurately reflect the opinions of the Kurdish people as a whole.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Michael Rubin tried and failed; Kwiatkowski rebutted his entire argument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KomissarSteve, post: 32434241, member: 176996"] And what if it caucuses with the GOP and splits with its party on the most important issue of the day? What then would we call it? And why, pray tell, should I take any of these organizations' word for it? Why shouldn't his actions speak for themselves? As I've already explained to you, campaigning. I'm not entirely sure why I should care a word about what the ACU says..."least conservative" does not mean "most liberal." No - only implying it strongly enough that I may as well have. Ah, good - only one conclusion. Never mind that it's the [i]central conclusion to both articles.[/i] [i]Again[/i], as I've already explained to you, the opinions of the Kurdish politicians do not accurately reflect the opinions of the Kurdish people as a whole. Michael Rubin tried and failed; Kwiatkowski rebutted his entire argument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
New interview with Pentagon whistleblower
Top
Bottom