Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
New interview with Pentagon whistleblower
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="oldbetang" data-source="post: 32432549" data-attributes="member: 118530"><p>If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, we can safely assume that it's a duck. Lieberman is a liberal. His ACU rating for 2004 was 0%. He consistantly gets 100% ratings from groups like NARAL, Planned Parenthood, the Human Rights Campaign, the Fund For Animals, and numerous labor organizations. He has gotten 100% ratings from the NEA, the Campaign for America's Future, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, and many 90+% from other liberal groups. He consistantly gets an "F" from the NRA, 0% ratings from small business groups, and 0% ratings from social conservative organizations like Concerned Women of America. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>Where was he then? Is that the explanation for 2004 when he also got a 0% from the ACU?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>It may be worth discussing but it wouldn't have been a case of you calling me Hitler.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I don't see that! There are two conflicting points made in that article. One that the Kurds want independence and the other that they don't.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>The paragraph I quoted speaks for itself.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Michael Rubin did!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="oldbetang, post: 32432549, member: 118530"] If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, we can safely assume that it's a duck. Lieberman is a liberal. His ACU rating for 2004 was 0%. He consistantly gets 100% ratings from groups like NARAL, Planned Parenthood, the Human Rights Campaign, the Fund For Animals, and numerous labor organizations. He has gotten 100% ratings from the NEA, the Campaign for America's Future, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, and many 90+% from other liberal groups. He consistantly gets an "F" from the NRA, 0% ratings from small business groups, and 0% ratings from social conservative organizations like Concerned Women of America. Where was he then? Is that the explanation for 2004 when he also got a 0% from the ACU? It may be worth discussing but it wouldn't have been a case of you calling me Hitler. I don't see that! There are two conflicting points made in that article. One that the Kurds want independence and the other that they don't. The paragraph I quoted speaks for itself. Michael Rubin did! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
New interview with Pentagon whistleblower
Top
Bottom