Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
new article published about the ethics of not allowing vaccine choice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lovingthistimethislife" data-source="post: 76340492" data-attributes="member: 438503"><p>Ive noticed that many different anti-choice ideas about vaccines have developed over this last year, just in the US alone we had the health experts advise people to not make decisions about what kind of vaccine to take and the mantra "the best vaccine is the first vaccine you can get" was repeated everywhere . I do think the idea that its wrong for people to be picky about what what vaccine they take is the basis of the vaccine mandates and the general view among people who support vaccine mandates this idea that there is nothing different about any of the vaccines that are available and no difference between traditional childhood vaccines and the new vaccines currently available . I talk to a lot of people who support vaccine mandated who justify it by comparing these vaccines to traditional vaccines that have been well tested and they really dont seem to realize or think about the differences. But of course a lot of people do see differences and do want to choose!</p><p></p><p>This all-vaccines-are-the-same mindset has led to the FDA rejecting (or at least partially responsible i believe) Covaxin in june for 18+ which is based on traditional vaccine technology - the reason given was because it wasnt necessary for it to get an EUA because there was plenty of supply of the new experimental vaccines. Now again just two days ago Covaxin has applied for an EUA this time for children will the FDA once again reject it because they dont think its needed?</p><p></p><p>To prevent access to safe vaccines that exist that use a technology people are familiar with and trust that does have long term safety data because of the false idea that they are all the same is unethical and im not the only one who thinks so - a recent article with 9 authors from John Hopkins University agree with the importance of offering vaccine choice and the trust that comes from respecting individual choice and preference for whatever reason. We need to return to the concept that people are individuals and vaccines are <em>not </em>all the same and respecting peoples choices and how they feel about it. Even if a person does not think there is any difference that perspective shouldnt be forced on anyone else, and people shouldnt be punished for not thinking all vaccines are exactly the same and completely safe.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/118/43/e2117185118" target="_blank">Opinion: The importance of offering vaccine choice in the fight against COVID-19</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lovingthistimethislife, post: 76340492, member: 438503"] Ive noticed that many different anti-choice ideas about vaccines have developed over this last year, just in the US alone we had the health experts advise people to not make decisions about what kind of vaccine to take and the mantra "the best vaccine is the first vaccine you can get" was repeated everywhere . I do think the idea that its wrong for people to be picky about what what vaccine they take is the basis of the vaccine mandates and the general view among people who support vaccine mandates this idea that there is nothing different about any of the vaccines that are available and no difference between traditional childhood vaccines and the new vaccines currently available . I talk to a lot of people who support vaccine mandated who justify it by comparing these vaccines to traditional vaccines that have been well tested and they really dont seem to realize or think about the differences. But of course a lot of people do see differences and do want to choose! This all-vaccines-are-the-same mindset has led to the FDA rejecting (or at least partially responsible i believe) Covaxin in june for 18+ which is based on traditional vaccine technology - the reason given was because it wasnt necessary for it to get an EUA because there was plenty of supply of the new experimental vaccines. Now again just two days ago Covaxin has applied for an EUA this time for children will the FDA once again reject it because they dont think its needed? To prevent access to safe vaccines that exist that use a technology people are familiar with and trust that does have long term safety data because of the false idea that they are all the same is unethical and im not the only one who thinks so - a recent article with 9 authors from John Hopkins University agree with the importance of offering vaccine choice and the trust that comes from respecting individual choice and preference for whatever reason. We need to return to the concept that people are individuals and vaccines are [I]not [/I]all the same and respecting peoples choices and how they feel about it. Even if a person does not think there is any difference that perspective shouldnt be forced on anyone else, and people shouldnt be punished for not thinking all vaccines are exactly the same and completely safe. [URL='https://www.pnas.org/content/118/43/e2117185118']Opinion: The importance of offering vaccine choice in the fight against COVID-19[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
new article published about the ethics of not allowing vaccine choice
Top
Bottom