• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Net Neutrality Shot Down

Chajara

iEdit
Jan 9, 2005
3,269
370
38
Milwaukee
Visit site
✟27,941.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6081882.html
The U.S. House of Representatives definitively rejected the concept of Net neutrality on Thursday, dealing a bitter blow to Internet companies like Amazon.com, eBay and Google that had engaged in a last-minute lobbying campaign to support it.

By a 269-152 vote that fell largely along party lines, the House Republican leadership mustered enough votes to reject a Democrat-backed amendment that would have enshrined stiff Net neutrality regulations into federal law and prevented broadband providers from treating some Internet sites differently from others.

Of the 421 House members who participated in the vote that took place around 6:30 p.m. PT, the vast majority of Net neutrality supporters were Democrats. Republicans represented most of the opposition.

Okay, so basically what might happen here is big telco companies will be able to do some sort of two tiered system with the internet. Something about prioritizing traffic. In other words, it looks like these companies might be able to say "We don't want anything to do with so-and-so company so good luck accessing their site at a decent speed." There's a big thread on the SomethingAwful forums discussing it, but I didn't see anything about it here so I thought I'd give everyone a heads up. Can someone who understands this better perhaps explain a bit? Word needs to get around so come voting time, the internet will stay like it is.
 

Qrusty

Active Member
Jun 2, 2006
327
17
55
Pacific Northwest
✟23,054.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It was a protection initiative that sadly failed. Many foresee a serious abuse coming in the form of control over what kind of information you'll be allowed to view over the internet. If you think there's a problem with other forms of media today and public perception, wait until powerful groups start controlling the internet.

The initiative failed because of trickery from sites like like this ****://www.votervoice.net/Core.aspx?AID=575&APP=GAC&IssueID=7519 who fool people into showing support for the rejection of the initiative.
 
Upvote 0

Nienor

why so serious
Jun 7, 2004
12,714
342
37
Seattle
✟37,216.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Boooo!
It makes me mad....I don't see how this can be seen as a good thing and if more people understood what was going on, there would be more of an uproar. Unfortunately, not enough people understand or care. Well, maybe they will care when its too late.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moros
Upvote 0

crazyfingers

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2002
8,733
329
Massachusetts
Visit site
✟33,923.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
So what about the Senate? They tend not to be as in-the-pocket of large corporate interests as are the House republicans.

Of course Bush is no hope. He rubber-stamps anything and then says that He personally don't have to follow the law.
 
Upvote 0

HisEagle

Senior Veteran
Feb 26, 2004
2,311
150
✟25,742.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I wonder how many people will actually put up with this. I personally won't see the need to keep my internet account if I can't reasonably access the sites I want. I can drop it like a hot potato if I need to. No skin off my back - but it would be money out of my IP's pocket, that's for sure.

Guess I'll start going back to the library and bookstores like I used to do when I wanted to learn about something.
 
Upvote 0