• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

National IDs

Status
Not open for further replies.

albez

Active Member
Sep 13, 2004
46
1
39
Leicester
✟173.00
Faith
Christian
There is a debate currently in the UK about whether we should have ID cards or not. If we did they would include biometric data about us on little chips on the cards, as well as information like Name etc and a photo.
I hope we don't end up having them just because the government would contain more personal information than it has already. Still I know there are advantages to it but I cannot believe that they will stop any terroist attacks, asylum seeker problems or anti-social behaviour.
I already have a driving licence which I can use as an ID card, as well as a Uni card and a Student card. Why do you need anymore?
 
Upvote 0

Individual-KesTrel

Individual
May 15, 2004
901
27
38
Ravenna Ohio, Earth
Visit site
✟1,190.00
Faith
Other Religion
Why in the world would you want to make debt cards govement run ?

Keep them priviatized. I dont imagine you have a job / debt card.

Something like a Photo + Age, Height, Hair Color substitute for a drivers licnece might be nice. Identifies if you're a visitor or a citizien.
 
Upvote 0

BobbieDog

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2004
2,221
0
✟2,373.00
Faith
Other Religion
The trouble with ID cards, and their part in mapping and tracking what people do, and are through what they do: is that we live in a **itty world; stuffed full of orthodoxy junkies, and exploitation freaks. These constituencies will exploit all ID based data systems, to putatively assert control over others. There's no two ways, it's what such dangerous freaks do: it's in their constitutional architecture, hardwired, reflexive.

If you become ensnared within such orthodoxy control, and you reject this: then you have to break and countervail that orthodoxy; and that's heavy for the foot soldier doing it, and it's heavy for the society suffering it.

ID cards are part of a nexus of putative control which breeds "terrorism": if we understand terrorism as that fundamental undermining of a hegemonic orthodoxy; where such undermining freaks the straights big time.

ID cards will instigate a plane of ultra control in the conventional: and force dissent, which may well increase, and perhaps dramatically, into planes of the ultra-unconventional.

A vote for ID based database systems of control and orthodoxy, in a world permeated with injustice and un-freedom, is a vote for terrorism.
 
Upvote 0

xXLurkerXx

Active Member
Jul 11, 2004
91
2
✟221.00
Faith
Atheist
We in germany have an identity card which we call Personalausweis. Your name, address and photo are part of it (no fingerprints).
Basically it only proves that you are you. That´s its main purpose and for this it is pretty effective.

I have been asked for my ID card more by private clubs then by state institutions, of course state institutions sometimes also want to see it.

In 32 years for example never a policemen asked for it, but they always want to see my driving license :D (evil driver) which basically has the same data in it (small differences), but it is not as secure against forgery as the ID card.

If you want a membership card for a video rental shop or fitness studio you show your ID card and prove that you are the person you are pretending to be.
If you do not pay your membership fees they know who you are and where you live ;).

I think my credit card informations (where you buy stuff and how much of it), my bank card or the informations on my health insurance card would be much more interesting for others then my ID card.

A thing I would be more worried about then having an ID card would be a change in our data protection act.
The data protection acts in germany are quite good.
 
Upvote 0

BobbieDog

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2004
2,221
0
✟2,373.00
Faith
Other Religion
xXLurkerXx said:
A thing I would be more worried about then having an ID card would be a change in our data protection act.
The data protection acts in germany are quite good.
You bring up two fundamental points:
(1) That ID defined data (information) can help our straight system turn its wheels: it does make administration of a densely packed social world, much more possible; it enables fiancial and legal control.
(2) That the dangers of data are recognised: and that Data Protection Acts intend to see data used safely and justly.

We too have a UK DPA, and we all work under EU direction. The UK state intends three big databases, to enable its administration.
Our DPA tends to be clunky: it's running very hard to try to catch up; enterprises are finding it soaks up a lot of resource.
There are lots of exceptions from the DPA, many to do with security: which under what statutes we have for the "war on terror", that can mean quite a lot is excluded from protection under the DPA.

My real concern is that data tends to reflect the operational needs of orthodoxies: it defines how we are seen from the point of view of such orthodoxies; and many times that data is at odds with how a subject sees themselves.
We have that dramatically currently, with many of Islam. Where the data the authorities hold, they can take to define a subject as a terrorist: where that subject might reject that designation, and with it the data; that subject holding to an alternative data set on themselves. Perhaps the person the authorities want to see as terrorist, with their data: the subject themselves might wish to define themselves as upholding the political and legal rights of a given group, with the data they use in their self definition.
When we deal with acts of violence, the difference between data sets could be become even more antithetical: the authorities designation of atrocity, with their data; being countered by the subject's designation as community defense, with their alternate data set.
While these political data sets stand some way from data on what things you bought with a credit card, they are part of what becomes in social practice, a single integrated information process.
At some point we move from data which can be defined somewhat neutrally or technically, to data sets about which there can be profound and political difference: where in our current global circumstance that takes us into the "war on terror" and thus security.
 
Upvote 0

Swart

ÜberChristian
Mar 22, 2004
6,527
204
59
Melbourne
Visit site
✟39,687.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
There was an attempt to introduce one in Australia in 1987, but it met with huge opposition. The government then by stealth extended the powers and requirements of the Tax File Number, requiring a TFN for all bank accounts, employment, social security etc.

The Queensland Government is trying to introduce a smart card drivers licence which would also act as an identification card. They also want the right to store information on the card without the card holder kowing what is stored there.
 
Upvote 0

feral

Dostoyevsky was right
Jan 8, 2003
3,368
344
✟27,716.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I actually prefer cash. I don't like people to know that I buy.
Absolutely. I do not carry any credit cards, and I only use checks for bill paying to school and my apartment expenses. Everything else is bought with cash or, if necessary, a money order. I do not appreciate having my shopping monitored or leaving paper trails.
 
Upvote 0

Swart

ÜberChristian
Mar 22, 2004
6,527
204
59
Melbourne
Visit site
✟39,687.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Bizzlebin Imperatoris said:
How is that important though? Doesn't the checkout person see what you buy?
When you swipe your flyby's card (and in some cases your CC), demographic information is gathered concerning you and your spending habits so that you can be "target marketed".

The bold plan is for digital TV to have tailored advertising - just for you, they know what you buy.

And you thought it was so you could watch movies on demand.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.