• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

NASA insider JEFF NOSANOV blows the whistle on the space agency's plot to sabotage Elon Musk's rescue mission

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,297
16,577
Here
✟1,414,070.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others




'We offered to bring them back early, but the offer was rejected by the Biden administration,’ Musk said Monday on Joe Rogan's podcast.

The following day, Wilmore appeared to support Musk when asked about the claim, 'I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says, is absolutely factual.'

Wilmore’s teenage daughter, Daryn, was even more emphatic in a recently resurfaced social media post from February: 'There's a lot of politics, there's a lot of things that I'm not at liberty to say... but there's been issues. There's been negligence. And that's the reason why this has just kept getting delayed.'
 

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
21,981
13,571
Earth
✟228,384.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat




'We offered to bring them back early, but the offer was rejected by the Biden administration,’ Musk said Monday on Joe Rogan's podcast.

The following day, Wilmore appeared to support Musk when asked about the claim, 'I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says, is absolutely factual.'

Wilmore’s teenage daughter, Daryn, was even more emphatic in a recently resurfaced social media post from February: 'There's a lot of politics, there's a lot of things that I'm not at liberty to say... but there's been issues. There's been negligence. And that's the reason why this has just kept getting delayed.'
Two day story
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,297
16,577
Here
✟1,414,070.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Is there any evidence presented or is it just a guy yapping?
1741442286191.png


NASA astronauts Barry Wilmore (from left), Nick Hague and Sunita Williams during a press conference from the ISS on Tuesday.
-NASA

One questioner asked about Musk’s recent claim that former President Joe Biden had intentionally stalled their rescue for “political reasons.”

In an earlier question, Wilmore denied that politics had anything to do with the team’s delayed departure, but he seemed to shift his stance when answering the later question.

“I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says, is absolutely factual … ” he said.



So, the NASA insider who worked there for nearly a decade made the claim, and one of the people currently stuck up there corroborated it.



Here's video of him saying it...I got it queued up to the timestamp.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,297
16,577
Here
✟1,414,070.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Let me get this straight: Boeing strands these astronauts, and SpaceX has been parked at the ISS since Sept 2024. One glaring question is, why aren't they already home?

There is a political component to it (whether people want to acknowledge it or not).

Doing so early via SpaceX would've been an "egg on the face moment" for a democratic administration.

1) They spent huge amounts of money on Boeing
2) The only non-Boeing options at their disposal would've been Musk or Russia.

So, nobody's going to want to quickly concede that they dumped a bunch of money into an inferior solution.

And they wouldn't want to do anything that would bolster the public perception of Musk (who was deeply aligned with their rival in the lead-up to an election) ...and they absolutely wouldn't have wanted to do anything that would've most certainly been leveraged as a propaganda victory for Russia by asking for their help.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Laodicean60
Upvote 0

durangodawood

dis Member
Aug 28, 2007
26,715
18,481
Colorado
✟510,634.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Interesting.

For now its all pretty vague with no sense of the position the "other side" would present. And Musk is a flat out public liar. So his notions always need extra scrutiny. And such a mission would never survive a blindly administered DOGE cull.

But I would not be shocked if this turned out correct. Politicians takes their image and interests pretty seriously. Reagan for example had hundreds of US hostage languish in Iran so he could look the hero later on.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

dis Member
Aug 28, 2007
26,715
18,481
Colorado
✟510,634.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Then this is false.
To my judgement it seemed more likely than not. And there was a lot of research on it, as I recall.

Re the topic, I would love to know more. OP is a good start, but we need to know more to form a reasonable judgement.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,039
28,598
Baltimore
✟705,858.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat




'We offered to bring them back early, but the offer was rejected by the Biden administration,’ Musk said Monday on Joe Rogan's podcast.

The following day, Wilmore appeared to support Musk when asked about the claim, 'I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says, is absolutely factual.'

Wilmore’s teenage daughter, Daryn, was even more emphatic in a recently resurfaced social media post from February: 'There's a lot of politics, there's a lot of things that I'm not at liberty to say... but there's been issues. There's been negligence. And that's the reason why this has just kept getting delayed.'

View attachment 362067

NASA astronauts Barry Wilmore (from left), Nick Hague and Sunita Williams during a press conference from the ISS on Tuesday.
-NASA

One questioner asked about Musk’s recent claim that former President Joe Biden had intentionally stalled their rescue for “political reasons.”

In an earlier question, Wilmore denied that politics had anything to do with the team’s delayed departure, but he seemed to shift his stance when answering the later question.

“I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says, is absolutely factual … ” he said.



So, the NASA insider who worked there for nearly a decade made the claim, and one of the people currently stuck up there corroborated it.



Here's video of him saying it...I got it queued up to the timestamp.
You really ought to learn to parse this stuff a bit better.

Let's start off with the "NASA insider": the guy worked at JPL as a low-level manager for a few years over 10 years ago. ISS isn't managed out of JPL. It's managed out of JSC in Houston. He doesn’t claim on LinkedIn to have worked on ISS. I'm sure he knows people involved, but he's hardly an "insider". (more on this later)

Next, let's look at what he actually says about Musk's claims:

While I don’t claim to know what was said behind closed doors at NASA – and even though I am no fan of Elon Musk who I believe is recklessly slashing away at the federal workforce - I wouldn’t doubt his claims either.
No one on NASA’s payroll is permitted to freely speak their mind. But as a former employee of the agency, I can tell you what I believe it to be the truth: our astronauts are at risk and allegations of political corruption at NASA are not to be dismissed.

That's it. The rest of the piece is general criticism of NASA and Boeing. All he says about this situation is that he doesn't know what happened, and that Musk's claim seems plausible. If you listen to what the astronaut, Wilmer, actually said, once you get back the obvious self-contradiction, it amounted to the same thing - that he didn't know.

So, because I was curious, I called up my very close family member who's been working on ISS since before this "insider" started at a different NASA facility over 1,500 miles away. This person, who once had a seat in mission control, confirmed what I'd read in the popular media - that, once the Boeing capsule was deemed too risky to give these folks a ride back, it was decided that they would sub in for the next crew rotation on the ISS and stay there for however many months the regularly scheduled duty cycle was. The plan all along was to have them return on a SpaceX capsule (SpaceX capsules are up there all the time), but that return trip has been delayed a couple times because SpaceX has been having production issues. In fact, they switched up the capsule they planned on using in order to bypass some testing requirements in order to get things going more quickly.

Arstechnica has an article saying virtually the same thing, but with more detail:

The program directors say it came down to practicalities of budget and the need to keep the station manned.

TL;DR: Musk is, again, full of it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
15,369
7,126
61
Montgomery
✟237,842.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Interesting.

For now its all pretty vague with no sense of the position the "other side" would present. And Musk is a flat out public liar. So his notions always need extra scrutiny. And such a mission would never survive a blindly administered DOGE cull.

But I would not be shocked if this turned out correct. Politicians takes their image and interests pretty seriously. Reagan for example had hundreds of US hostage languish in Iran so he could look the hero later on.
How did Reagan do this since Carter was the president? The hostages were not released until Reagan took office.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

dis Member
Aug 28, 2007
26,715
18,481
Colorado
✟510,634.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
How did Reagan do this since Carter was the president? The hostages were not released until Reagan took office.
The Reagan group was perfectly capable of contacting Iran without the white house or state dept. providing channels.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
15,369
7,126
61
Montgomery
✟237,842.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Reagan group was perfectly capable of contacting Iran without the white house or state dept. providing channels.
A candidate for president had the power to get Iran to release the hostages? Sounds like a conspiracy theory
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

durangodawood

dis Member
Aug 28, 2007
26,715
18,481
Colorado
✟510,634.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
A candidate for president had the power to get Iran to release the hostages? Sounds like a conspiracy theory
Thats exactly what it is. This one has a reasonable probability of being true, imo.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

dis Member
Aug 28, 2007
26,715
18,481
Colorado
✟510,634.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
You really ought to learn to parse this stuff a bit better.

Let's start off with the "NASA insider": the guy worked at JPL as a low-level manager for a few years over 10 years ago. ISS isn't managed out of JPL. It's managed out of JSC in Houston. He doesn’t claim on LinkedIn to have worked on ISS. I'm sure he knows people involved, but he's hardly an "insider". (more on this later)

Next, let's look at what he actually says about Musk's claims:




That's it. The rest of the piece is general criticism of NASA and Boeing. All he says about this situation is that he doesn't know what happened, and that Musk's claim seems plausible. If you listen to what the astronaut, Wilmer, actually said, once you get back the obvious self-contradiction, it amounted to the same thing - that he didn't know.

So, because I was curious, I called up my very close family member who's been working on ISS since before this "insider" started at a different NASA facility over 1,500 miles away. This person, who once had a seat in mission control, confirmed what I'd read in the popular media - that, once the Boeing capsule was deemed too risky to give these folks a ride back, it was decided that they would sub in for the next crew rotation on the ISS and stay there for however many months the regularly scheduled duty cycle was. The plan all along was to have them return on a SpaceX capsule (SpaceX capsules are up there all the time), but that return trip has been delayed a couple times because SpaceX has been having production issues. In fact, they switched up the capsule they planned on using in order to bypass some testing requirements in order to get things going more quickly.

Arstechnica has an article saying virtually the same thing, but with more detail:

The program directors say it came down to practicalities of budget and the need to keep the station manned.

TL;DR: Musk is, again, full of it.
Very interesting. For sure if a claim comes from Elon's mouth, that an indicator it needs to be well scrutinized before we build a theory from it.
 
Upvote 0