Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
NAACP says: Oust Bush!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kermit" data-source="post: 8510826" data-attributes="member: 18056"><p>The NAACP always endorses one candiate over another. Sometimes they win sometimes they don't, but whoever wins always speaks before the NAACP.</p><p> </p><p>I am not arguing that Bush never visited the NAACP. What I am arguing is that Bush is holding an unreasonable grudge against them. The statements made by the NAACP in 2000 were not scathing. The ones now are, but they are a reaction to the disrepect Bush has shown toward them. I don't condone, but I understand it.</p><p> </p><p>BTW an ad hominem attack isn't possible when a person or his actions are the argument.</p><p> </p><p>Examples:</p><p>1) You say you're for Bush. Me calling you stupid is an ad hominem attack.</p><p>2) You wipe your butt with poison ivy. Me calling you stupid is not an ad hominem attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kermit, post: 8510826, member: 18056"] The NAACP always endorses one candiate over another. Sometimes they win sometimes they don't, but whoever wins always speaks before the NAACP. I am not arguing that Bush never visited the NAACP. What I am arguing is that Bush is holding an unreasonable grudge against them. The statements made by the NAACP in 2000 were not scathing. The ones now are, but they are a reaction to the disrepect Bush has shown toward them. I don't condone, but I understand it. BTW an ad hominem attack isn't possible when a person or his actions are the argument. Examples: 1) You say you're for Bush. Me calling you stupid is an ad hominem attack. 2) You wipe your butt with poison ivy. Me calling you stupid is not an ad hominem attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
NAACP says: Oust Bush!
Top
Bottom