Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
My Water Kind Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kylie" data-source="post: 75221612" data-attributes="member: 343110"><p>The trouble is that you are making an arbitrary decision to claim that kind and genus mean the same thing, and then you are holding up your arbitrary decision as evidence that the Bible got it right.</p><p></p><p>I can easily claim that Paul Karason is a Smurf, and therefore Peyo had it right all along, but that doesn't make it real, does it? You are doing the same thing as that. You are saying, "This particular thing (which has no real world evidence) is the same as that other thing (which does have real world evidence), so this source I have here which talks about the first thing must be right." It's bad logic, AV, and you shouldn't be using it.</p><p></p><p>Of course, if you can show that there's some actual basis to justify your claims, then that would be a different story, but so far you haven't done that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kylie, post: 75221612, member: 343110"] The trouble is that you are making an arbitrary decision to claim that kind and genus mean the same thing, and then you are holding up your arbitrary decision as evidence that the Bible got it right. I can easily claim that Paul Karason is a Smurf, and therefore Peyo had it right all along, but that doesn't make it real, does it? You are doing the same thing as that. You are saying, "This particular thing (which has no real world evidence) is the same as that other thing (which does have real world evidence), so this source I have here which talks about the first thing must be right." It's bad logic, AV, and you shouldn't be using it. Of course, if you can show that there's some actual basis to justify your claims, then that would be a different story, but so far you haven't done that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
My Water Kind Challenge
Top
Bottom