Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A few alluded to that there were no records of Adam, but there are of Darwin.
Why is the written record in the Bible, not considered a record? Do people think they weren't capable of keeping records that far back or what?
If I chose to, I could easily assume the record of Darwin was not accurate.
No
But they were written by a man led by GOD to write down thee records that a man might desire to know the truth
and Moses knew GOD and had heard HIS VOICE and knew that there had to have been a starting point
Yasser Arafat already tested It, and It came through with [literally] flying colors.Lemme guess - the Bible. Shame we can't test that claim, isn't it?
Yup -- even false prophets.People of every religion say that.
I love to pwn this example (and its grayscale counterpart).
Are you suggesting evolution can be demonstrated with this example?
If so, then why does evolution have so many missing links?
And if there aren't any missing links, then are you saying you can daisy chain cyanobacteria to man by laying physical evidence down side-by-side?
Just mistakes.There are many records of Darwin (including the DNA that was passed onto his offspring), and they present no contradiction at all.
Darwin’s second mistake was to assume that humans were in some ways different from all oher organisms. He expressed this difference by the very mechanism of evolution – of SELECTION. The process of selection from a set of offspring contending for survival can cover the spectrum of complete accident (such as the luck to survive a disaster) to deliberate measures to obtain an advantage. There is no need for a distinction between different organisms. Yet Darwin chose to make a distinction between NATURAL SELECTION and ARTIFICIAL Selection. Implying that Darwinian selection carried out by humans is different or superior to selection that occurs with non humans.
You are here
You are a testament to the truth that there was a first.......parent
It won't workSo now you accept not only evolution, but ultra-rapid evolution?
Again you are changing the outside package, the superficial outward man by changing and altering and unnaturally changing the gene makeup so that "super genes" are expressed
How about the inner man?
Will this outer package guarantee a perfect inner quality human goodly man?
It didn't work for Eve who was taken out from Adam
The outer packaging was different but one would have thought that the inner image should have remained (again not talking about the gene makeup but the spirit)
And Sandra will tell you who her parent isI am testament to the fact that I have a parent. Her name is Sandra and she is a photographer (a rather good one too).
The many genetic similarities I have with other life forms are testament to the fact that I am the result of an evolutionary process which began hundreds of millions of years ago.
Yasser Arafat already tested It, and It came through with [literally] flying colors.
I do not respond to dudeWoah, hold on there dude.
-57 is the one who claimed that all the millions of species we have today speciated out from the ones that were on the ark. Evolution as we understand it can't do that in only a few thousand years. So there must have been some kind of rapid-evolution. If you disagree, fine. Take your beef up with him - he's the one saying it.
Hardening your heart, are you?
Just don't try to convince us you know what you're talking about by using that grayscale example on us ... or I'll pwn it.The fact that we don't have examples of every single life form that has ever existed, from one generation to the next does not mean we don't know what we are talking about.
Yes many claim to have god(s) but deny THE SONPeople of every religion say that too, that anyone from another religion is a "false prophet.
It won't work
There will be an ultra rapid work but it won't lead to evolution
And it will be similar to your example used
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?