Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My Reconciliation Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FishFace" data-source="post: 42660979" data-attributes="member: 175009"><p>Of course, you're just being bloody-minded here. You know <em>exactly</em> why Bytes' response was a simple period, because you know exactly how irrational <em>your</em> response is. Or at least, how irrational it looks to anyone who doesn't share one of your assumptions - an assumption, I would point out, very <em>few</em> people in this world share and one which, of the many many <em>many</em> occasions you have been challenged on it, you respond probably less than 5% of the time.</p><p>On <em>those</em> rare occasions, you also refuse to continue any sensible debate, and cease replying after one or two back-and-forths. Hence it is <em>no wonder</em>, really, that we see your beliefs as irrational, that we "dislike" (or at any rate, disagree with) a lot of what you say.</p><p></p><p>The only reason I can see that you claim to be disliked for what you are is that you consider this fundamental, unevidenced assumption of the Bible's accuracy to be some fundamental part of <em>you.</em> That, however, is a rather odd thing to do - you'd be much more accurate in saying we don't like/disagree with one of the things you <em>believe.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FishFace, post: 42660979, member: 175009"] Of course, you're just being bloody-minded here. You know [I]exactly[/I] why Bytes' response was a simple period, because you know exactly how irrational [I]your[/I] response is. Or at least, how irrational it looks to anyone who doesn't share one of your assumptions - an assumption, I would point out, very [I]few[/I] people in this world share and one which, of the many many [I]many[/I] occasions you have been challenged on it, you respond probably less than 5% of the time. On [I]those[/I] rare occasions, you also refuse to continue any sensible debate, and cease replying after one or two back-and-forths. Hence it is [I]no wonder[/I], really, that we see your beliefs as irrational, that we "dislike" (or at any rate, disagree with) a lot of what you say. The only reason I can see that you claim to be disliked for what you are is that you consider this fundamental, unevidenced assumption of the Bible's accuracy to be some fundamental part of [I]you.[/I] That, however, is a rather odd thing to do - you'd be much more accurate in saying we don't like/disagree with one of the things you [I]believe.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My Reconciliation Challenge
Top
Bottom