Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My Reconciliation Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AV1611VET" data-source="post: 42632428" data-attributes="member: 152669"><p>This isn't an emotional outburst generated by a persecution complex, US38. This is based on about a year's observation of some of the things I've said, that, quite frankly, has taken me by surprise; because even <em>agreeing</em> with "scientists" doesn't matter.</p><p></p><p>For example:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">My Apple Challenge proves that there's no science in Genesis 1 at all --- yet people hate it for some reason.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I contend that there is absolutely no evidence for the Flood --- yet I get ridiculed.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I support the literal method of Bible interpretation, yet I get ridiculed; while those who support an allegorical interpretation get ridiculed as well.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">My latest thread shows that almost everyone who takes my Ex-nihilo Challenge cannot explain how mass/energy came into existence; yet <em>creatio ex nihilo</em> is the only one that is automatically ruled out as an option by those "in the know."</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I contend the earth is 4.57 billion years old, then get accused of being a YEC.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">My Bicycle Challenge shows that a single bicycle can have two different ages, an existential age and a physical age, and it gets ridiculed; while the age of rocks on the earth routinely "reset" themselves.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Some say believing in Creationism stunts scientific growth, yet no one at all can tell me what they can do differently in a laboratory or science class that a Creationist cannot do.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I claim we hold science up to a higher Standard than even "scientists" themselves do, then get ridiculed for bashing it.</li> </ul><p>I hear the sirens of the wahmbulance, so I'll stop here; but open up your eyes and take a look around - your future is at stake here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AV1611VET, post: 42632428, member: 152669"] This isn't an emotional outburst generated by a persecution complex, US38. This is based on about a year's observation of some of the things I've said, that, quite frankly, has taken me by surprise; because even [I]agreeing[/I] with "scientists" doesn't matter. For example: [LIST] [*]My Apple Challenge proves that there's no science in Genesis 1 at all --- yet people hate it for some reason. [*]I contend that there is absolutely no evidence for the Flood --- yet I get ridiculed. [*]I support the literal method of Bible interpretation, yet I get ridiculed; while those who support an allegorical interpretation get ridiculed as well. [*]My latest thread shows that almost everyone who takes my Ex-nihilo Challenge cannot explain how mass/energy came into existence; yet [I]creatio ex nihilo[/I] is the only one that is automatically ruled out as an option by those "in the know." [*]I contend the earth is 4.57 billion years old, then get accused of being a YEC. [*]My Bicycle Challenge shows that a single bicycle can have two different ages, an existential age and a physical age, and it gets ridiculed; while the age of rocks on the earth routinely "reset" themselves. [*]Some say believing in Creationism stunts scientific growth, yet no one at all can tell me what they can do differently in a laboratory or science class that a Creationist cannot do. [*]I claim we hold science up to a higher Standard than even "scientists" themselves do, then get ridiculed for bashing it.[/LIST]I hear the sirens of the wahmbulance, so I'll stop here; but open up your eyes and take a look around - your future is at stake here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My Reconciliation Challenge
Top
Bottom