Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My questions for an 'evolutionist'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CabVet" data-source="post: 62238250" data-attributes="member: 297812"><p>Because we can. I know this answer will not satisfy you, but it is the only one there is. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, gene (and even whole genome) duplications are common. I can link to hundreds of references on this subject, do you want them?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why didn't bacteria change? Why didn't corals (which are older than coelacanths) changed)? You have to change the theme, if you just ask the same questions that are asked in creationist websites it will just look like you are copying and pasting from them. Anyhow, here is the answer (for all of the above):</p><p></p><p>Because they didn't need to. Their habitat was very stable during this entire time and there was no need to change. Evolution does not have a purpose. To quote Darwin: "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change". The idea that evolution has a direction or eliminates "old" things is a false one propagates by creationists.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I can give you links to literally hundreds of scientific papers on this subject if you want. The fact that a species hybridize does not mean that it is not undergoing speciation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>None. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you want to discuss abiogenesis, I suggest you start a new thread and maybe read about it first. Life did not start with "clay".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CabVet, post: 62238250, member: 297812"] Because we can. I know this answer will not satisfy you, but it is the only one there is. Yes, gene (and even whole genome) duplications are common. I can link to hundreds of references on this subject, do you want them? Why didn't bacteria change? Why didn't corals (which are older than coelacanths) changed)? You have to change the theme, if you just ask the same questions that are asked in creationist websites it will just look like you are copying and pasting from them. Anyhow, here is the answer (for all of the above): Because they didn't need to. Their habitat was very stable during this entire time and there was no need to change. Evolution does not have a purpose. To quote Darwin: "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change". The idea that evolution has a direction or eliminates "old" things is a false one propagates by creationists. Yes, I can give you links to literally hundreds of scientific papers on this subject if you want. The fact that a species hybridize does not mean that it is not undergoing speciation. None. If you want to discuss abiogenesis, I suggest you start a new thread and maybe read about it first. Life did not start with "clay". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My questions for an 'evolutionist'
Top
Bottom