Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Stability of the sun? I guess you forgot about sunspots and solar flares, the latter which at any time could potentially wipe out life on earth if they get big enough.
Yes, every other star we found is not stable with it's light and heat. If our sun were off by even 1% it would be detrimental for life.
This is what scientists claim allowed life to develop here. The stability of our sun. (Hot stars are rare and most normal stars are cooler than our sun.)
Source?
Most (75%) of stars are younger/smaller than our sun. A few are larger. None are exactly like our sun.[/quote
Where does it say that in the article?
Also, there are trillions upon trillions upon trillions of stars in the universe. I don't think we've observed all of them. I don't even think we can observe all of them.
Most (75%) of stars are younger/smaller than our sun. A few are larger. None are exactly like our sun.[/quote
Where does it say that in the article?
Also, there are trillions upon trillions upon trillions of stars in the universe. I don't think we've observed all of them. I don't even think we can observe all of them.
Until then, our star is different than all the others.
Until then, our star is different than all the others.
There are plenty of stars that "sort of" match our sun but nothing matches it exactly. I'd say that means our sun in unique as far as we know right now.
Most (75%) of stars are younger/smaller than our sun. A few are larger. None are exactly like our sun.
Solar analog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wonder what percentage of "stars" fall to the earth according to biblical prophecy in both the OT and NT.You're making an argument from ignorance. What you're doing is basically akin to walking into the Biltmore House, examining the foyer, and saying, based on that one, little room, that there aren't any mice in the entire house. You can't look at less than 1% of the universe and make a judgment called about the other 99%. That's ridiculous.
You don't know that. You have nothing to base that statement on. The article you cited doesn't even make that claim. And don't think I neglected to notice that you didn't bother to show where that article supported you.
Since when does a star have to be 100% exactly the same as ours to support life? There are different orbits planets can have, it wouldn't matter so much of a star gave off less energy if the planet orbited closer to it, or if it gave off more but the planet orbited farther away.
He is not here to examine. But even with those, the fact would still remain that he was a 20 some year old male, that was just created with no history, yet with embedded history since he appeared that old from day one. (Aged bones, fully formed organs and muscles, language and thinking abilities built in....etc.)
Do you honestly think it's that simple?
Do you honestly think that life is so limited that only one possible configuration of a solar system could sustain it?
We're talking about conditions that sustain life, not create it. And nobody cares what you believe is or is not possible.
I am a born again Christian, on a Christian forum. If you don't like my views or the biblical historical record then you are free to leave. No one is stopping you.
Yes. I do not believe for one second that it is possible for nature to make something complex out of nothing. Even if all the goldilocks conditions were in place.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?