Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
My Kidney Challenge II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tall73" data-source="post: 76824458" data-attributes="member: 125574"><p>Great. </p><p></p><p>But you still haven't built the argument for why everyone has bodily autonomy in the first place. And again you reduce everything to "want". </p><p></p><p>Do you ever have a moral principle that goes against what you might want? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would think that includes the baby in the womb that pulls back from the pain of an abortion as its limbs are torn from its body. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, a fertilized human egg has human DNA and is human. A canine fertilized egg has canine DNA, and is not human. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So then if you base bodily autonomy on personhood, shouldn't you then be protecting it all along so as to not violate your principles through misperception? </p><p></p><p>I assume you have some time that is definitely including personhood. Is it for instance the time of completed brain development, in the 20's or is it some time earlier?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tall73, post: 76824458, member: 125574"] Great. But you still haven't built the argument for why everyone has bodily autonomy in the first place. And again you reduce everything to "want". Do you ever have a moral principle that goes against what you might want? I would think that includes the baby in the womb that pulls back from the pain of an abortion as its limbs are torn from its body. Yes, a fertilized human egg has human DNA and is human. A canine fertilized egg has canine DNA, and is not human. So then if you base bodily autonomy on personhood, shouldn't you then be protecting it all along so as to not violate your principles through misperception? I assume you have some time that is definitely including personhood. Is it for instance the time of completed brain development, in the 20's or is it some time earlier? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
My Kidney Challenge II
Top
Bottom