Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Right -- and the war in Iraq didn't originate on Guam.Which is to say: we've got proof that the "war in heaven" did not originate in Judaism.
Revelation 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,With an omnipotent, singular (or triune) deity, the very concept of a war in heaven becomes nonsensical,
Thank you for sharing your personal experience; I cannot deny personal experience, I've had my own experiences with Buddhism.
One of the things we would say is that one of the most powerful forces in the universe is conscious intention, e.g. calling out for "Jesus" or "Krishna" in a fervent believer.
However, I do not see how such a personal experience makes you believe you heard from an infinite being vs. an extremely powerful yet limited being
That is not how many early Buddhists like myself understand how devas interact with people.
My apologies, I thought I already answered the question here.
I am not Hindu, and I am agnostic towards their gods. Devas, in Buddhism, are merely consciousnesses who have acquired greater power, lifespan, and pleasures because of former good kamma.
When the good kamma which sustains their heavenly life expires, those devas will die and
may very well be reborn as a lesser deva, human, animal, or even in the hell realms because they will be experiencing the fruits of other kamma. Likewise,
humans can cultivate good kamma which may propel our consciousness on to experience a deva existence.
I did, and my answer to that can be gleaned from the very post you quoted:
We can reconstruct when these elements appeared where, and who borrowed from whom.
If you acknowledge the findings of philology in relation to Zoroastrianism in order to make your case ,you'd also have to acknowledge them in relation to the Jewish and Christian scriptures.
Which is to say: we've got proof that the "war in heaven" did not originate in Judaism. There's a good chance that angels didn't, either.
With an omnipotent, singular (or triune) deity,
the very concept of a war in heaven becomes nonsensical, as the Rabbinical Jews realized.
You basically pointed it out yourself, iconoclast: any act of Satan can only happen with God's permission, so the very concept of "rebelling against god" becomes anathema.
God could undo or prevent any damage effortlessly, and any damage that DOES happen takes place with the deity's knowledge and consent.
In Daniel 10, Daniel is beside the river Hiddekel, and he was praying about the upcoming deliverance of his people; since the 70th year of captivity was approaching.
He had been praying three weeks with no answer.
Finally, by the river Hiddekel, an angel gets through to him and tells him that God had heard his prayer from the very first, but the angels couldn't get an answer down to him as Satan and his angels fought to prevent that from happening.
It took them summoning Michael the Archangel to come and get them "punched through" to deliever God's answer to Daniel.
THAT, I consider "war in heaven."
What?Funny that you should mention Daniel 10, since that is a place where God's angels do battle with their Persian equivalent. Not Satan. Not demons. Not fallen angels. A "prince" of Persia, akin to the "prince" Michael who helped the messenger best their opponent.
Look at that passage again. There is no mention of Satan, or fallen angels, or demons, or rebels cast out of heaven. Only a "prince of Persia", who is bested with the help of the "prince" Michael after more than twenty days' delay.What?
Did you read the whole chapter?Look at that passage again. There is no mention of Satan, or fallen angels, or demons, or rebels cast out of heaven. Only a "prince of Persia", who is bested with the help of the "prince" Michael after more than twenty days' delay.
Then it wasn't the "Hebrew religion" as the "Hebrew religion" started out.Jane_the_Bane said:That's not a mortal aristocrat. That's a reference to Zoroastrian angels, from a time when the Hebrew religion was closer to henotheism than monotheism, and other gods were still considered real, if less powerful.
The most important experience has been this: by practicing the Buddhist Eightfold Path, I have substantially reduced my experience of suffering. I am not aware of any Christian who have followed the Christian path and have experienced an increase in lifespan.What personal experiences do you have? A couple should suffice for the time being.
In Buddhism, conscious intention is said to power all stratas of reality.Please indulge me, how is conscious motor intention linked to visions or the supernatural?
I don't know either way. If your intuition knows that you heard from an infinite being, then that is personal knowledge. Others cannot know if your experience originated from a powerful yet limited being, or an infinite being. I'm merely giving an alternate explanation for such experiences.This experience is not audible in my heart by rather like a spiritual intuition , in my heart ... How about you show me how these experiences link to an extremely powerful yet limited being and not the Christian God.
How & why does anyone interact with anyone else? Do we normally interact with lesser beings, like bacteria?Well my friend, how does a deva interact with you or an early buddhist?
That question is irrelevant, as we cannot know the answer; speculation is irrelevant. The far more important question is "what is suffering & what is its cessation?", as the Buddha rightly taught.Who created the earth?
If belief is based on personal communication from/with your deity, then evangelism, faith, and scripture becomes irrelevant.Why shouldnt the communication be personal?
The conscious awareness experiences the results of its kamma. It may experience heavenly states, the human state, hellish states, etc.What are consciousnesses?
Apparently they can be known, through certain practices prescribed by the Buddha. The Buddha describes how individuals, after cultivating a meditative jhanic state, experienced a Brahma deity, and then believed they've contacted the Creator and Father God:Why can there be nothing known about these devas? How come they have names?
I don't know this yet, I was simply describing what I understood Buddhism teaches.How do you know this if you agnostic about them?
There is no expiration date.I thought the reason to seek nirvana was to escape the wheel. Does this mean there is an expiration date on enlightenment?
Good kamma includes skillful intentions & choices through the body, speech, or mind and involves non-greed, non-aversion, and non-delusion.How does one cultivate good kamma?
Is this part of your Eightfold Path?The most important experience has been this: by practicing the Buddhist Eightfold Path, I have substantially reduced my experience of suffering.
It's a relative thing I guess. Your not even coming close to what I'm pointing towards as God being one's reality. Do you see God? Smell God? Touch God? Hear God? Cry with God? Laugh with God? Dance with God?Hey hey my dear.
Check out my reply to ananda and tell me what you think?
I'm a Lover of the God Jesus prayed to. Which to me is a different God than the Christian God.Well my friend are you a lover of the Christian God?
That's correct. Don't you?When you see the soul of human beings you see an activity of God?
Of the options given, I say more like inherent is the essence of Creation itSelf.Does the Spirit of God live, exist, merge, mix or is inherent in nature, or is He sitting in His throne in heaven with Jesus by His side?
Well, I think I did. But I guess I'm not understanding what kind of answer your looking for. Can you help me with that?Please excuse me my friend. That didnt really answer my question.
What was this event or occurrence - which leaves an impression on someone - of the Light of God with in the essence of this Creation?
I gave you references to your question. If you choose to not to explore them, that's OK. I get it.Thank you for the suggestion however i will not be reading any of these recommendations.
I have been. But are you listening?It seems you have read them. Please tell me.
That's what I've been doing. But Mysticism isn't your interest or curiosity, so we talk pass each otherPlease give me your personal experience in relation to
What event or occurance proved that the spirit of the Christian God exists in nature? ( eg plants, trees, animals, rocks, etc,)
And ALL of Creation.The essence of Christ exists in nature?
The stuff that is God.What God stuff?
Light.What is Christ essence of God?
Higher than the beliefs, dogmas and perceptions that make up our beliefs of God, no matter what religion.What is higher than God?
Pure source of the Creation.What is this source you speak of?
I didn't say that Baptist do. You asked which denomination and being unsure I suggest Baptist.I can assure you baptists do not consider Christianity compatible with dualism. I think you have misinterpreted what is going on. Ask me?
We are talking past each other again. In Dualism I look at how we experience the whole of life as we walk through it. For instance, is that Tree a separate thing apart from me? Or is it the Tree and I One. We in the West see everthing in dualastic perspective. The indigenous cultures on the other hand see everything as a verb, very alive, one and whole.This is not dualism and i think you may have misunderstood. Fending of temptation or demon possession does not equate to equal and opposing forces.
Christianity is not compatible with dualism. Satan is not equal to God - as seen in the Book of Job - in fact he needs permission from God. Satan is a liar, the accuser and the tempter.
He tried and failed to usurp heaven. He was given a verdict and will face punishment. I wouldnt call this relationship equal or a balanced opposition. Satan was an angel who wanted to be in place of God and was unsuccessful.
Another defintion for dualism
dualism means the belief in two supreme opposed powers or gods, or sets of divine or demonic beings, that caused the world to exist.
Demonic beings were not instrumental in the creation of the world.
Sin (bad) is disobedience to God and is not a dimetric or equally opposing force. Darkness is the absence of light.
I can see a person named "Jesus" being born. The Christ aspect I experience as cosmic in reach such that the whole of the Universe is the body of Christ.Do you believe in the birth, life, death and ressurection of Christ?
What I "see" is that God is way too big to fit into any single religion. And that God is just as alive and vibrant in others of other spiritual paths.Do you believe He is the Son of God and there is no other gods but God. He has revealed Himself as God the Father, God the Son and God the Spirit?
It's more who Jesus prayed to that I accept into my Heart. At the same time, I've spent quite a bit of time in Jesus working with the Heart of Christ. I suspect you don't know what I mean by that.Do you accept Jesus into your heart?
What I confidently do is to call myself a Lover of God.Would you confidently call your self a disciple of Jesus - a Christian?
Satan isn't a part of my life, only God is.Satan has been let loose and out there accusing, temting and lying. Still this does not equate to equally opposed and mutual to existance.
That's nice. I'm more interested in the exploration of the mystery than doctrine. And, I've never tried to "prove" anything. All I've done is to share my own spiritual experience. If your looking to tangle, I'm not your guy. If you have a true curiosity as you said in the beginning, than maybe we have something to work with.Please excuse me. So far you really havent proven anything. I have the dictionary and sound Christian doctrine to back me.
Iconoclast, in my roughly 15 years on these forums, I've learned to distinguish between those who really want to dig deeper and require sources, and those who'll just dismiss whatever academic research is presented to them and only want to antagonise whatever does not fit their pre-conceived world view.
As a rule of thumb, I do not treat internet discussions the way I'd treat a scholarly publication. I'm happy to share, but do not feel compelled to do the legwork for every commenter who doesn't even bother to look at google by himself.
Besides, I'm not revealing deep mysteries or controversial findings here. All of what I wrote is readily available in the form of scholarly research, with much better printed publications that anything I could whip up as an online resource.
I'll address your final question, though:
In a hypothetical scenario where an all-powerful, all-knowing entity exists, there can be no opposition unless the opponent was equally powerful and knowledgeable. Take that away, and every act of "going against the deity's will" happens with the deity's knowledge and - ultimately - consent. Otherwise, the act would be impossible by default.
Here, let me give you an example.
I'm omnipotent.
Someone tries to set a house on fire.
No matter what happens next, that house will not burn unless I allow it to - at which point I can no longer claim that I do not want that to happen, since I could have prevented or undone it in a billion different ways. Thus, the notion of "going against my will" becomes meaningless. Nothing happens unless I allow it. No opposition could ever harm me, ever jeopardise my plans, ever cause any effect that is not sanctioned by me.
Was he suffering? If not, the Eightfold Path served him well in his protest and martyrdom. It also had international effect on America's association with the Vietnamese Diem government back in 1963. Though the picture is black and white, the effect of the Eightfold Path isn't.Is this part of your Eightfold Path?
Friedrich Reiterer: Angels: the concept of celestial beings - origins, development and reception. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007.
Jürgen van Oorschot: The origins of Yahwism. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017
I think the question as it is worded is just pretty much asking people "Are you a Christian?" But if you erase the word 'Biblical' the question would more so be a question about hyper historical skepticism.Is the Biblical Jesus Christ a man-made invention?
Martyrs don't kill themselves.Was he suffering? If not, the Eightfold Path served him well in his protest and martyrdom.
I hardly think that a monk giving his life protesting a corrupt Hitler like regime fits into the same category.Martyrs don't kill themselves.
Glorifying what this oddball did just reinforces the martyr complex and insures more "kamikazes" will follow suit.
Were Klebold & Harris martyrs? was Adolf Hitler a martyr?
Absolutely not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?