Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I chose "humanist" because I like Greek philosophical influences, and also because I think humanity is being denigrated by these ongoing wars. Also, "humanist" in a sense that belief in God is potentially essential for myself at least, to have a healthy human psycology..
OT: But, are there threads or a blog or something where you discuss what a Muslim Humanist is?
I chose "humanist" because I like Greek philosophical influences, and also because I think humanity is being denigrated by these ongoing wars. Also, "humanist" in a sense that belief in God is potentially essential for myself at least, to have a healthy human psycology.
You mean from Katherine Elwes Thomas, who started that rumor?
I'm not aware of horses that have tried to put anything together, let alone an egg. Do you have some kind of evidence that horses are capable of attempting to put anything together - it need not be an egg.Show me ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Humpty Dumpty didn't actually occur as written.
And I mean SPECIFIC evidence of non-occurrence.
And don't give me that "you-cant-prove-a-negative hype" until you show it's a negative in the first place.
This should be interesting; as you don't know:
Science is myopic.
- who he was
- who the king was
- any of the king's horses or men
- what kingdom he represented
- what wall he sat on
- anything
As I said in my OP, we don't know who he was.Where in the Documentation did we get that Humpty Dumpty is an Egg?
Or assume it did then do some research.Suppose it did occur? metaphorically, of course.
Consider doing some Hunting?There's your mistake. The burden of proof is on the side of the positive claim. All this tells us that it's a claim without merrit. Might as well be making claim about undetectable pink unicorns.
You see, AV, I happen to be a descendant of Richard III, and the fact that the nursery rhyme was an analogy about my ancestor has been passed down through my family for generations.
Nope. There is good evidence that the flood could not have happened as described in the bible, it is not just a claim.I know what it is.
I'm just challenging academia to show me what it isn't.
If they can claim there's evidence that the Flood wasn't global, let them show there's evidence that Humpty Dumpty wasn't real.
The evidence suggests it did happen! It was written by an EYE WITNESS. And they had everything to lose by sharing this story as clearly people would write them off as insane.Show me ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Humpty Dumpty didn't actually occur as written.
And I mean SPECIFIC evidence of non-occurrence.
And don't give me that "you-cant-prove-a-negative hype" until you show it's a negative in the first place.
This should be interesting; as you don't know:
Science is myopic.
- who he was
- who the king was
- any of the king's horses or men
- what kingdom he represented
- what wall he sat on
- anything
Whats the point of proving anything about fiction?Show me ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Humpty Dumpty didn't actually occur as written.
And I mean SPECIFIC evidence of non-occurrence.
And don't give me that "you-cant-prove-a-negative hype" until you show it's a negative in the first place.
This should be interesting; as you don't know:
Science is myopic.
- who he was
- who the king was
- any of the king's horses or men
- what kingdom he represented
- what wall he sat on
- anything
Humpty Dumpty was a cannon, according to a forgotten source.Show me ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Humpty Dumpty didn't actually occur as written.
And I mean SPECIFIC evidence of non-occurrence.
And don't give me that "you-cant-prove-a-negative hype" until you show it's a negative in the first place.
This should be interesting; as you don't know:
Science is myopic.
- who he was
- who the king was
- any of the king's horses or men
- what kingdom he represented
- what wall he sat on
- anything
I find it difficult to believe that a cannon that falls off of a wall couldn't be put back together again.Humpty Dumpty was a cannon, according to a forgotten source.
Believe it or not ... it is difficult to recast a cannon while you are under siege.I find it difficult to believe that a cannon that falls off of a wall couldn't be put back together again.
Then it must have fallen inside the wall, as "all the king's horses and all the king's men" arrived to fix it.Believe it or not ... it is difficult to recast a cannon while you are under siege.
The Egg-citing Truth Behind Humpty Dumpty
Show me ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Humpty Dumpty didn't actually occur as written.
Sorry.
When I ask for actual, specific evidence for something, then get some philosophical "thats-not-how-it-works" excuse, I tend to get a little testy.
Show me ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Humpty Dumpty didn't actually occur as written.
And I mean SPECIFIC evidence of non-occurrence.
Science is myopic.
Correct.You do realize you're asking for proof of a negative. Right? You DO realize that, correct?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?