Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's not covered with a mile of moondust, either.
Excuse me, but I don't see you meeting his challenge:
So let's see your explanation of that feature, and other features similar around the world by using a Flood.
Since everything is "in your favor," as you say, how about you bestow some favor on us and give us your explanation (with, of course, respect to the OP).
Starbucks has a filthy logo.Ihop an Starbucks are made of moodust.
Starbucks has a filthy logo.
No doubt created by some design scientist.
Didn't I say that in so many words?The only way that you can get deeply incised gooseneck meanders over a very short geologic period is by suspending the laws of physics.
Didn't I say that in so many words?
This is a meaningless statement and gives no explanation. Another utter failure.
And again, this does not explain how the features formed at all.
Sorry, but this challenge is for flood believers to explain first. Perhaps we can discuss your situation later.
If you say so.This failure is so bad on your part that it seems to border on blasphemy..
The contradiction tells us that the canyon has to be extremely old. A young Earth model cannot explain this unless you posit a dishonest God and that would seem to be blasphemy to me.
And the meander could not have formed in the flood itself. Fast moving receding flood waters, and they would have had to be to clear the Earth in a year, would not have formed meanders. Even if there was a flood the meander itself could not have formed until after it. The steep slopes tell us that the erosion that occurred was relatively slow and through consolidated sediments. In other words solid rock. The picture debunks the Noah's Ark story.
No, it's not.That is because it is a bit of trick question.
Bet me.It can't be answered using a flood.
Whether you think it's just a tale or not, it's been used to meet your challenge.The picture tells us that the Noah's Ark story is simply a tale adopted by the early Hebrews from another older culture.
Didn't we say that this means you have failed the challenge?
Who's "we"?
I was told in the challenge to use the Flood.Every rational person. If you have to invoke unevidenced violations of basic physics, then you don't have an explanation.
Scientists claim our DNA is twisted.I can see this thread is screwed already.
I was told in the challenge to use the Flood.
Are you saying his challenge is in violation of basic physics?
I used basic physics when I said the water did the etching.Implicit in the challenge is the use of basic physics and geology.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?