Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Denying the evidence doesn't mean there is no evidence.but we still discuss the eye evolution (and flagellum) and we still dont have any evidence that it could evolve stepwise. so why do you think we can prove that other system can evolve?
It's stretching an interpretation of a translation of an ancient creation story. Not terribly impressive, that. It's neither empirical nor testable proof of anything, other than literary license.
Not so, since anyone can read and understand that God told us of things which are just now being discovered by Science. This is important since He also told us that He was going to pour out His Spirit (The Spirit of Truth) upon "ALL flesh" in the last days of this Earth:
Act 2:17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of My Spirit upon all flesh:
All flesh includes atheists, agnostics and scientists, which means that He will pour out His Truth through Science, since that is the only way unbelievers will accept His Truth. Are you ready for God's Truth? Or will you be "willingly ignorant" 2Pe 3:5 like the Scoffers of the last days? 2Pe 3:3
Question: If you call a dog's tail a leg, will the dog's tail have all the characteristics of a leg?why do you think that a living creature cant be consider as robot?
ok. lets start with the second paper. they even admit that they start with a light sensitive patch. so their first step is again too complex to begin with. it's actually prove my point that some steps need at least several parts at once.
We have observable and documentable mechanisms in nature for biological evolutionary change.
Meanwhile, we don't have any observable instances of supernatural forces changing or creating biological organisms.
So there is that.
How is DNA supposed to point to an imaginary ancestor that did not exist in the first place? Molecular sequences are available mostly from present living organisms, not imaginary nonhuman creatures. It is as scientific as assuming DNA will point to the physical existence of goblins and unicorns. The Evos don't even know what the supposed ghost creature was in the first place. What exactly is the DNA sequence for a theoretical creature which was the supposed ancient ancestor between modern man and nonhuman ape? It is all about as scientific as reading tea leaves or conducting a seance. Get out of the fog.
We might not know all the ancestors of man, and might not have the DNA, but we do know from fossils what many of them were like. For instance:The Evos don't even know what the supposed ghost creature was in the first place. What exactly is the DNA sequence for a theoretical creature which was the supposed ancient ancestor between modern man and nonhuman ape?
it may be possible. so?Woah, dude, don't jump ahead here. So yes, you can feel it.
Now, let's say we made a kind of bowl shaped indentation in your skin. If sunlight comes in at an angle, say from the left, it will only warm up the side of the bowl on the right, yes?View attachment 204477
The fact they opted to start with a light sensitive patch (which makes since given that they are modeling the evolution of more complex eyes) in no way 'proves' that light sensitive patches are too complex to evolve naturally.
If you want to demonstrate that something is impossible to evolve, you need to demonstrate some sort of physical barriers. You still haven't done that.
Furthermore, I linked over a half dozen papers, some of which do touch on pathways for the evolution of the first photoreceptors. I suggest spending more time researching this topic.
so if i will made a robot that made from organic components it will not be a robot but organism?Question: If you call a dog's tail a leg, will the dog's tail have all the characteristics of a leg?
Answer: No. It does not matter what you call the tail, it is still a tail.
Question: If you call a living creature a robot, will that living creature have all the characteristics of a robot.
Answer: No. It does not matter what you call the creature. It is still a creature.
Understand?
I'm still in the dark about how you think changes in amino acid could cause the evolution of a light-sensitive spot.so we dont have even one paper that could show us how the first eyespot evolved?
but i said why we cant build a light detector stepwise. so for now lets agree that so far all the evidences we have support the claim that a light detector cant evolve stepwise. till we will have an explanation how it could evolve we need to go by the evidence we have so far and not by the evidence we dont have. this is how science work. agree?
if so link me to a specific paper. but if it will not say how many amino acid we will need to change for the evolution of the first lgiht detector then the paper is actually meaningless.
great. so you basically agree that a living thing can be consider as a robot under some situations.Depends on how you made it, but it might be both.
but i said why we cant build a light detector stepwise.
so for now lets agree that so far all the evidences we have support the claim that a light detector cant evolve stepwise.
if so link me to a specific paper. but if it will not say how many amino acid we will need to change for the evolution of the first lgiht detector then the paper is actually meaningless.
So what? No one has ever made a robot which was a living creature as well, so your example is purely imaginary.great. so you basically agree that a living thing can be consider as a robot under some situations.
I never said that. You can make a robot out of wood if you want. That would still be a robot.so if i will made a robot that made from organic components it will not be a robot but organism?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?