Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life" John 1:1Was this story taken down in a court of law, under oath, and preserved until now?
Produce evidence that verifies this:
Genesis 5:24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.
... or admit that there are things God did that didn't generate any.
"That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life" John 1:1
The Bible is considered to be personal first hand experance.
The Bible is considered to be personal first hand experance.
What about Jesus quoting from "Noah" and "the prophets?"
If these what you call "oral traditions" (that were later written) were inaccurate would Jesus quote from them? In quoting from them
HE VALIDATED THEM!
There are many references in the bible to the written account "the Book of Law etc." I will provide references to these if you like.
So we are back to Jesus and the 66 authors of the bible ALL being liars is the only way you can negate the "truth of God's Holy Word".
What about Jesus quoting from "Noah" and "the prophets?"
If these what you call "oral traditions" (that were later written) were inaccurate would Jesus quote from them?
Jesus can and did use parables. If the story of Noah was a particularly apt analogy for the more is was trying to get across, why on Earth shouldn't he use it?What about Jesus quoting from "Noah" and "the prophets?"
If these what you call "oral traditions" (that were later written) were inaccurate would Jesus quote from them? In quoting from them
HE VALIDATED THEM!
There are many references in the bible to the written account "the Book of Law etc." I will provide references to these if you like.
So we are back to Jesus and the 66 authors of the bible ALL being liars is the only way you can negate the "truth of God's Holy Word".
R U trying to work both sides of the street? Luke was a doctor and so he was trained to know how to investigate and do research. If he were to do a study on cancer then perhaps that would be fine with you, no problem. But he wants to do case study on a person: Jesus and now you have a problem. The funny thing is Luke was the only person to sit down and talk to Mary his "mother". Also Luke recorded a lot of the history of the early church. Perhaps his medical background gives Luke a more exacting approach, compared to someone like Josephus who was know to accept money to make people look good in his history books.Except where it's not. Luke 1:1-4
R U trying to work both sides of the street? Luke was a doctor and so he was trained to know how to investigate and do research. If he were to do a study on cancer then perhaps that would be fine with you, no problem. But he wants to do case study on a person: Jesus and now you have a problem. The funny thing is Luke was the only person to sit down and talk to Mary his "mother". Also Luke recorded a lot of the history of the early church. Perhaps his medical background gives Luke a more exacting approach, compared to someone like Josephus who was know to accept money to make people look good in his history books.
So if your not a monster does that mean you do not like Lady Gaga?
Don't need a link.
The Ark was made of what the Bible calls 'gopher wood' -- which, of course, is nothing more than copper, mixed with trace elements, called "pitch" -- (probably carbon for hardness).
Keep in mind that Noah's predecessors were top-notch metallurgists.
Thus the Ark was a giant state-of-the Ark submarine, complete with periscope.
How else are you guys going to understand?You just love making stuff up, don't you, AV?
Since you refuse to accept empirical evidence then I shall provide you with the type of evidence you prefer. Long live cartoon physics...or should I say cartoon biology.... Oh well! here is proof that monkeys and bears can sing Jazz!!!The Holy Bible is the only scientific evidence that exists.
Since Darwinists have no scientific evidence, evolution is a fairy-tale for grownups.
How else are you guys going to understand?
You don't like Truth, and now you're complaining about fiction?
What's left? science?
Produce evidence that verifies this:
Genesis 5:24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.
... or admit that there are things God did that didn't generate any.
No -- think about it.Ah, biased opinion. You are assuming that it actually happened. After all, we can explain the fact that there is no evidence by saying it never happened, can't we?
No -- think about it.
Since it happened, yet there's no evidence for it; then if you're right, and it didn't happen, then there should be evidence for it -- otherwise, you're setting up a false dichotomy.
That's correct -- because it happened as documented.There is no evidence; even you admit this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?