Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Science tells us that everyone died between 30 & 40. That means that prehistoric , pre flood people did not age. We know at the time of Noah's flood God established a new covenant with Noah and his descendants. A part of that dispensation was that people would be limited to 120 years.Science can give us a good idea of the age of human skeletons when they died
Science tells us that everyone died between 30 & 40. -snip-
Just do a google search on pre historic life expectancy. Or check to see what wiki has to say about it.Citation needed.
Just do a google search on pre historic life expectancy. Or check to see what wiki has to say about it.
The whole point is we are saying people lived a lot longer then what science claims.
What are you talking about? My whole point was that it is a myth that pre civilization man only lived to be 35. So if you disagree with science then that means you agree with me. Lets go back to the start. All I am asking is for you to show me the remains of a pre civilized person that science can show us lived PAST their prime. So far you have failed to meet my challenge. You have failed to show that prehistoric people aged the way people began to age AFTER Noah's Flood. Because God established a New Covenant with Noah and Noah's descendants. This was the beginning of a new dispensation.That's not what science tells us. That's what math tells us.
The whole point is that mankind did not age until after Noah's flood. So you need to produce evidence of that old age existed before the Flood.I would not call it a myth. I'd call it a misundersatnding of the data.
Yes there was a global flood at the time of the breakup of Pangea. Noah's flood was just a shadow and type of the flood that took place when that super-continent was broken up. Even the flooding that took place at the end of the last ice age created a major extinction. There have been lots of world wide extinctions like we read about in the story of Noah. A shadow is far from an exact representation of the object that we study by looking at the shadow.There was no global flood. Never. Ever.
Sorry, I don't accept what you're asserting.Yes there was a global flood at the time of the breakup of Pangea. Noah's flood was just a shadow and type of the flood that took place when that super-continent was broken up. Even the flooding that took place at the end of the last ice age created a major extinction. There have been lots of world wide extinctions like we read about in the story of Noah. A shadow is far from an exact representation of the object that we study by looking at the shadow.
I spent three months once doing a study on Ghost Ranch Carnivores that we find all the way through the Rocky Mountains all the way up to Montana.
Of course not because you do not accept the truth. We already know that by what you call yourself. To reject God means that you reject the truth by definition. Because God is absolute truthSorry, I don't accept what you're asserting.
That is exactly what I am telling you is "what actual scientists assert". Do you check this stuff out at all? I am not showing you a pretty drawing like the evolutionists like to scam people with. I am showing you an actual fossil of an actual dinosaur that was found on Ghost Ranch. The scientist involved in this was palaeontologist Edwin H. Colbert. In fact this has a lot to do with the theory of Continental Drift becoming Plate Tectonics. Perhaps you need to do a bit of study on the break up of Pangaea because it looks like this is something you have not looked into at all.I'll take what actual scientists assert
it looks like he got that from Wikipedia and deliberately cut off the next column which, for the very first one, reads as follows:I would not call it a myth. I'd call it a misundersatnding of the data.
I do, I do check this stuff out. It's why I know you're full of bullshido.Of course not because you do not accept the truth. We already know that by what you call yourself. To reject God means that you reject the truth by definition. Because God is absolute truth
That is exactly what I am telling you is "what actual scientists assert". Do you check this stuff out at all? I am not showing you a pretty drawing like the evolutionists like to scam people with. I am showing you an actual fossil of an actual dinosaur that was found on Ghost Ranch. The scientist involved in this was palaeontologist Edwin H. Colbert. In fact this has a lot to do with the theory of Continental Drift becoming Plate Tectonics. Perhaps you need to do a bit of study on the break up of Pangaea because it looks like this is something you have not looked into at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelophysis
.
Color me shockedit looks like he got that from Wikipedia and deliberately cut off the next column which, for the very first one, reads as follows:
"Based on the data from recent hunter-gatherer populations, it is estimated that at 15, life expectancy was an additional 39 years (total 54), with a 0.60 probability of reaching 15.[11]"
Now that is a myth.
The whole point is that mankind did not age until after Noah's flood. So you need to produce evidence of that old age existed before the Flood.
Yes there was a global flood at the time of the breakup of Pangea. Noah's flood was just a shadow and type of the flood that took place when that super-continent was broken up. Even the flooding that took place at the end of the last ice age created a major extinction. There have been lots of world wide extinctions like we read about in the story of Noah. A shadow is far from an exact representation of the object that we study by looking at the shadow.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?