Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Muslim man sues Little Caesars, claiming 'halal' was a lie in Dearborn
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dzheremi" data-source="post: 71316061" data-attributes="member: 357536"><p>If the damages need to be awarded according to the man's personal belief that he will go to hell for having mistakenly and without his consent eaten pork via Little Caesars, then shouldn't the damages awarded be zero? After all, what amount of money could possibly ameliorate the apparently unalterable decision made to damn a person for making a mistake?</p><p></p><p>Also, geez, what a jerk that makes the Islamic god seem like. The man ought to sue God (it <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawsuits_against_God" target="_blank">wouldn't be the first time</a>), as well as his parents and wider community for making him so neurotic by essentially forcing him into this situation on account of his religion.</p><p></p><p>My Church is way more serious about dietary regulations than Islam is, and yet I can tell you (because I've asked) that if I were to ask my priest or bishop what we are to do if we accidentally eat meat or are in a situation where we have to eat meat during the fasts (e.g., non-Orthodox family obligations with no alternatives), they'd tell me to stop thinking about fasting that way and just keep trying; don't let it drive me crazy. Where's that option for Muslims?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the man should definitely get something purely based on the idea that companies should be held to their advertising claims, but such an exorbitant sum seems ridiculous.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dzheremi, post: 71316061, member: 357536"] If the damages need to be awarded according to the man's personal belief that he will go to hell for having mistakenly and without his consent eaten pork via Little Caesars, then shouldn't the damages awarded be zero? After all, what amount of money could possibly ameliorate the apparently unalterable decision made to damn a person for making a mistake? Also, geez, what a jerk that makes the Islamic god seem like. The man ought to sue God (it [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawsuits_against_God']wouldn't be the first time[/URL]), as well as his parents and wider community for making him so neurotic by essentially forcing him into this situation on account of his religion. My Church is way more serious about dietary regulations than Islam is, and yet I can tell you (because I've asked) that if I were to ask my priest or bishop what we are to do if we accidentally eat meat or are in a situation where we have to eat meat during the fasts (e.g., non-Orthodox family obligations with no alternatives), they'd tell me to stop thinking about fasting that way and just keep trying; don't let it drive me crazy. Where's that option for Muslims? Anyway, the man should definitely get something purely based on the idea that companies should be held to their advertising claims, but such an exorbitant sum seems ridiculous. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Muslim man sues Little Caesars, claiming 'halal' was a lie in Dearborn
Top
Bottom