Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Muslim man sues Little Caesars, claiming 'halal' was a lie in Dearborn
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldWiseGuy" data-source="post: 71315637" data-attributes="member: 139156"><p>Both of them have revealed that they knew what pork pepperoni was, before they ate it. He because of appearance, she because of taste. There is no case here. They are just trying to fleece Little Caesar's. Additionally this shop is probably a franchise, so the parent company will have little if any liability.</p><p></p><p>Case in point. McDonald's was successfully sued for scalding hot coffee which injured a customer (I can attest that their coffee was often much too hot). This was standard practice throughout the company, including franchise stores. Accidently or carelessly using the wrong meat topping is not only not a company wide practice but not even a single franchise practice, unless the employee was ordered to do so by the owner or manager. Failing this test all liability falls on the individual employee.</p><p></p><p>However, if the franchise decides to<em> defend</em> the employee they may be inviting liability for that employee's mistake. Best to fire the employee for his or her carelessness and stand 'outraged' along with the Muslim customer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldWiseGuy, post: 71315637, member: 139156"] Both of them have revealed that they knew what pork pepperoni was, before they ate it. He because of appearance, she because of taste. There is no case here. They are just trying to fleece Little Caesar's. Additionally this shop is probably a franchise, so the parent company will have little if any liability. Case in point. McDonald's was successfully sued for scalding hot coffee which injured a customer (I can attest that their coffee was often much too hot). This was standard practice throughout the company, including franchise stores. Accidently or carelessly using the wrong meat topping is not only not a company wide practice but not even a single franchise practice, unless the employee was ordered to do so by the owner or manager. Failing this test all liability falls on the individual employee. However, if the franchise decides to[I] defend[/I] the employee they may be inviting liability for that employee's mistake. Best to fire the employee for his or her carelessness and stand 'outraged' along with the Muslim customer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Muslim man sues Little Caesars, claiming 'halal' was a lie in Dearborn
Top
Bottom