Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Musk releases Twitter internal documents showing details of suppression of Hunter Biden laptop story
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="essentialsaltes" data-source="post: 77030547" data-attributes="member: 294566"><p>'these discussions' in the OP is in reference to the Hunter Biden laptop story. <strong>For crying out loud, I literally replied to your statement about the "New York Post story exposing the now widely authenticated laptop."</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">Stepping back, it comes as no surprise that DHS, within its purview for national security, has a hotline to media to alert them to government objections. Despite <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota#Basic_case_law_resulting_from_this_case" target="_blank">First Amendment protections against prior restraint</a>, national security issues can overrule the First Amendment.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"><em>No prior restraint of the content of news by the government is allowed unless it reveals crucial military information, contains obscenity, or may directly incite "acts of violence".</em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"><em></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"><em>----</em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">Would you be willing to draw your line for what would be objectionable with respect to this hotline? If it turns out this hotline has never been used to 'order' the suppression of speech, would that satisfy you that nothing illegal occurred?</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="essentialsaltes, post: 77030547, member: 294566"] 'these discussions' in the OP is in reference to the Hunter Biden laptop story. [B]For crying out loud, I literally replied to your statement about the "New York Post story exposing the now widely authenticated laptop."[/B] [SIZE=1]Stepping back, it comes as no surprise that DHS, within its purview for national security, has a hotline to media to alert them to government objections. Despite [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota#Basic_case_law_resulting_from_this_case']First Amendment protections against prior restraint[/URL], national security issues can overrule the First Amendment. [I]No prior restraint of the content of news by the government is allowed unless it reveals crucial military information, contains obscenity, or may directly incite "acts of violence". ----[/I] Would you be willing to draw your line for what would be objectionable with respect to this hotline? If it turns out this hotline has never been used to 'order' the suppression of speech, would that satisfy you that nothing illegal occurred?[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Musk releases Twitter internal documents showing details of suppression of Hunter Biden laptop story
Top
Bottom