• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Most reliable method of preserving doctrine?

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican


The premise is that the written ONLY applies if a contradiction. If the written is silent, the oral stands as legally binding. Now read what I posted.




.
 
Upvote 0

ivebeenshown

Expert invisible poster and thread killer
Apr 27, 2010
7,073
623
✟32,740.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The premise is that the written ONLY applies if a contradiction. If the written is silent, the oral stands as legally binding. Now read what I posted.
I did read what you posted.

"I studied Mormonism for about a year. I discovered nothing in LDS Tradition that contradicted Scripture. By your rubric, it's all true then. I disagree with your rubric (thus, I'm not LDS)."

orthocat did not say that 'if something doesn't contradict Scripture, then it's all true' as you are implying. He posed no such 'rubric'. Why don't YOU read what HE posted now?
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
The premise is that the written ONLY applies if a contradiction. If the written is silent, the oral stands as legally binding. Now read what I posted.

What is written doesn't automatically supersede what is spoken.

I already went over this some time ago regarding chains of "best evidence" here

 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Trumped by written contracts.


My rental contact even contains a clause something like this: "This agreement supersedes any oral agreements."

If you have a clause in that contract then probably yes, it might in that case. To then assume that a written contract supersedes an oral contract is a mistake.

Further something can be explictly stated in a written contract that is not enforceable in law.

For example you could draw up a written contract saying that you are going to make regular monthly payments on a car and pay in cocaine.

This, despite being written would not be enforceable because it is illegal.

 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
What is written doesn't automatically supersede what is spoken.


I see. When does it and when doesn't it?


Because I found nothing in Mormonism that contradicts Scripture. I don't think ANY of the difference between the EO and RC (remember 1054) countradict Scripture and they both were said so are they both correct?


When WHAT/WHO speaks? Joseph Smith? The Orthodox Church? Jim Jones? Pope Benedict? Martin Luther? Mary Baker Eddy? The Anglican Church? Arius? Ignatius? Origen? The Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod?


WHICH Tradition? EOC? OOC? RCC? LDS?




.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I see. When does it and when doesn't it?
That would depend on your jurisdiction, what the area of law is, and so on.
Because I found nothing in Mormonism that contradicts Scripture. I don't think ANY of the difference between the EO and RC (remember 1054) contradict Scripture and they both were said so are they both correct?
That's your own argument turned on your own stance.

You keep repeating this logical fallacy that two different and opposing beliefs some how mean either
a) neither are right
or
b) we can't know who is right.

If you want to discuss WHICH is right, that's the subject of a totally different discussion.

I don't know why you keep repeating this fallacy - perhaps you've no other point to discuss.

But here's something for you... show me why two opposing theories are both wrong

To give you an example of what comes up all the time.... currently in the theory of evolution there are two mutually exclusive ideas regarding the rise of man - an 'Out of Africa' hypothesis (aka Mitochondrial Eve), and a Multi-regional theory (aka Diregional theory). Science doesn't seize up because of this. Both could be wrong. But that there are two mutually exclusive claims doesn't mean both are automatically wrong

But I'd like to see how you think that they would be.


 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Most reliable method of preserving doctrine?
put it in a jar and seal it tight.
& put it in a Qumran Cave.
I think someone did that one already

Like who?




.
 
Upvote 0