Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They can't be heretical or have no bearing on LDS theology when the sources quoted are your own books!!!
...many of which are not official, something that you seem to have a hard time admitting.
Actually not a SINGLE quotation this list uses is from Mormon scripture. Not a single one.They are all from mormon scripture though!
I don't want to call specific names here... But suffice it to say that some of the "ex Mormons" on here either totally don't know the LDS faith, and/or have serious issues telling the truth.How can you sat that when we have ex mormons who sat that the sites info is very much true?
I wanted you to respond in your own words and directly to what I posted.
That's the standard we expect.
Simply spamming us with more links to other questionable sites isn't helping your case any.
...except they are not our books.
As I noted in another thread, if you ever have reason to ask whether or not a work is official, check the copyright page.
Any work that's official will be put out through the Church itself, and so it will either read "Copyright Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" or "Copyright Intellectual Reserve."
If the work is published by anyone else, then that anyone else is a third party. This third party has no authority to state what is or isn't official, and so whatever they publish will run the gamut from "profitable to study" to "unorthodox".
LOL---Not official----written by Mormons for Mormons, published by Mormons---but not official---Doctrines and Covenants and the Book of Mormon are not official??? History of the Mormon church not official?? I guess the word "official" needs clarifying---as defined by Mormonism that is.
Look. The list below has the location for that bit of text! How can you say they are not from mormon authority?
More deceptive untruthful sites
Because most of the works you cited are not authoritative.
My original post quotes the material that is, and also notes why some of the works you reference are not authoritative.
Sorry, but you would say that even when the evidence is right in front of you!!! Now, that is blind faith buddy!
You say which parts are not fact then?
Hmmm, I guess someone changed their mind on "mormon bashing"... imagine that.Sorry, but you would say that even when the evidence is right in front of you!!! Now, that is blind faith buddy!
You say which parts are not fact then?
Antletems: I'm going to use this example to illustrate to you how the CARM website is knowingly and intentionally deceiving you about LDS beliefs.Jesus
- "Therefore we know that both the Father and the Son are in form and stature perfect men; each of them possesses a tangible body . . . of flesh and bones," (Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 38).
- "The birth of the Saviour was as natural as are the births of our children; it was the result of natural action. He partook of flesh and blood--was begotten of his Father, as we were of our fathers," (Journal of Discourses, vol. 8, p. 115).
- "Elohim is literally the Father of the spirit of Jesus Christ and also of the body in which Jesus Christ performed His mission in the flesh . . . " (First Presidency and Council of the Twelve, 1916, God the Father, compiled by Gordon Allred, p. 150).
By your same logic, I should presume that people like the Florida minister who burns Korans speaks for you, correct?
After all, he's a "Good Christian" minister, right?
Or perhaps it's time to admit that there's a line to be drawn somewhere, eh?
Antletems: I'm going to use this example to illustrate to you how the CARM website is knowingly and intentionally deceiving you about LDS beliefs.
1) Deception by false sources: NONE of these sources are LDS scripture. The website conveniently neglects to tell you that these are entirely non-canonical non-official sources. If they wanted to actual poke holes at LDS beliefs, they could use actual scripture.
2) Out of context: all three "sources" are quotes taken out of context to distort their meaning.
3) Deception by omitting the most critical and important things of LDS beliefs in Christ. Let's look at some actual central LDS beliefs on Christ:
A. Christ is the anointed (Greek) or Messiah (Hebrew)
B. Jesus, who is called Christ, is the firstborn of the Father in the spirit and the Only Begotten of the Father in the flesh.
C. He is Jehovah and was foreordained to His great calling in the Grand Councils before the world was.
D. He was born of Mary at Bethlehem,
E. He lived a sinless life
F. Christ wrought out a perfect atonement for all mankind by the shedding of His blood and His death on the cross.
G. He rose from the grave and brought to pass the bodily resurrection of every living thing and the salvation and exaltation of the faithful.
H. He is the greatest Being to be born on this earth.
I. He is the perfect example
J. All religious things should be done in His name.
K. He is Lord of lords, King of kings, the Creator, the Savior, the God of the whole earth, the Captain of our salvation, the Bright and Morning Star.
L. He is in all things, above all things, through all things, and round about all things.
M. He is Alpha and Omega, the first and the last;
N. His name is above every name and is the only name under heaven by which we can be saved.
O. He will come again in power and glory to dwell on the earth and will stand as Judge of all mankind at the last day.
Hmmm... that's a lot of really important beliefs that your website conveniently neglected to mention... why do you think they "forgot" to tell you these things?
Did you notice how much of Antletem's list quotes D&C or BoM? Not very much...What is not official about Doctrines and covenants, and the BOM--and Church History---can you please tell me that?!
If you would like me to explain the difference between LDS scripture and something that is written by a guy who happens to be Mormon, I can do that again.1. That is interesting. Publications, written by Mormons, for Mormons, are not about Mormonism----None of your writings are scripture so we do understand they are not scripture.
For example, quote #2 is gravely taken out of context. I'd rather not rehash this again myself, but you can read a good recap of it here:2. It would be much more helpful if you would state exactly what is taken out of context and what it is supposed to mean according to you instead of such a generalization, which you guys are constantly doing.
If a website is going to describe LDS beliefs, and omit vast majority of the beliefs, that is a HUGE problem.3. It is not deceptive to omit stuff we already know you supposedly do believe and have no problem with!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?