• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced

Liquid water found in Valles Marineris canyon on Mars
Sky News Australia 16 hrs ago

Scientists have found another pocket of water in the Valles Marineris canyon on Mars, according to ANU astrophysicist and cosmologist Dr Brad Tucker.


“Valles Marineris is this giant canyon on Mars, so it’s about 4,000 kilometres wide or long, so it’s wider than Australia, 200 across, and it could be seven kilometres deep, it could be the Grand Canyon on steroids,” he told Sky News Australia.

Dr Tucker said it is believed to have been formed by erosions like canyons on Earth, and [missing word: sampling?] underneath a probe has proved there is liquid water.

“Everywhere we keep looking on Mars, we find ice, we find water underneath the surface,” he said.

“It becomes exciting because we really do think this place was hospitable, did have life, and then it strongly has the chance that’s there now and discoveries like this give us more places to look.”

Source:
Liquid water found in Valles Marineris canyon on Mars (msn.com) (incl Video Interview)

Every drop of water brings us one step closer to MARTIANS!!
(as a youth I regularly OD'd on SciFi.) - OB

http://a.msn.com/01/en-au/AARWesJ?ocid=sf
https://twitter.com/share?url=http:...rer=http://a.msn.com/01/en-au/AARWesJ?ocid=st
https://web.whatsapp.com/send?text=http://a.msn.com/01/en-au/AARWesJ?ocid=sw
 

Attachments

  • upload_2021-12-19_9-44-12.png
    68 bytes · Views: 13
  • upload_2021-12-19_9-45-10.png
    68 bytes · Views: 15

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,310
21,473
Flatland
✟1,088,172.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
“It becomes exciting because we really do think this place was hospitable, did have life, and then it strongly has the chance that’s there now and discoveries like this give us more places to look.”
I totally agree. It's becoming exciting because we really then have strongly discoveries chance look place.
 
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
I totally agree. It's becoming exciting because we really then have strongly discoveries chance look place.



I agree. The English expression in the article is dreadful. Missing words and mangled sentences.

What can I say. It's Sky News - another Murdoch internet/TV dishrag closely related to Fox in the US.
OB
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Neat! And apparently you can drink it...when you find the underground source.


Nice article.

Looking at the 2nd last para there's chance we could start the War of the Worlds on Mars by accidentally crash landing a nuclear powered rover. The ultimate sign of human involvement appears to be some form of pollution. The Martians will not be impressed.

While an official landing site has yet to be determined for the robotic explorer, scientists will have to use caution when making their selection. The Mars 2020 rover is equipped with a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) – basically, a nuclear power source. As explained in a recent article, rovers are not allowed to roam the Red Planet all willy nilly; there are specific guidelines governing where they can and cannot go. Since Mars 2020 will rely on nuclear power, it will need to land in an area void of any potential habitable conditions or liquid water. This is a safety precaution in case of a crash landing – they don’t want to wipe out any potential habitable areas.
OB
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,049
2,232
✟210,340.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
If this dude's looking at solely at ground penetrating radar images, he needs to read up on this .. and then provide an explanation of his conclusions:
Mars' bright south pole reflections may be clay—not water
Sky news(?) .. Yeah, right.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
If this dude's looking at solely at ground penetrating radar images, he needs to read up on this .. and then provide an explanation of his conclusions:
Mars' bright south pole reflections may be clay—not water
Sky news(?) .. Yeah, right.


Great - a bit of scientific fisticuffs demonstrating that scientists are not sheep tied to the apron strings of an international conspiracy (I love mixed metaphors).

I will await any resolution with interest.

OB
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,049
2,232
✟210,340.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
What probe is the OP referring to?
Tucker mentions MRO. MRO uses the onboard SHARAD radar instrument.
The clay based water article I posted references ESO's Mars Express MARSIS intrument.
Wiki gives a brief comparison of the design capabilities of the two instruments here: I'd say the differences between the respective conclusions probably lies in the method of analysis of the respective data(?)

Has Tucker published a paper on this yet?
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Reactions: Sabertooth
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,049
2,232
✟210,340.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
I reckon the whole SkyNews report is a load of hype.
All Tucker is saying is that there has been general detections from past data/instruments of subsurface water-ice from orbiters and so there's maybe liquid deeper down.
The SkyNews hype then attempts to make out this is ground-breaking news of life on Mars(?)
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Has Tucker published a paper on this yet?

Tucker is a sciencey talking head used on a number of Australian channels as a commentator/reporter/explainer on astrophysical/cosmological stuff.

As far as I know he has no direct involvement with the EU probe.

OB
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced


SkyNews is often crap. In this case New Scientist also has an article dated 16 Dec 2021.

Water on Mars: Large deposits found below the surface at the equator | New Scientist
The team used the Fine Resolution Epithermal Neutron Detector instrument aboard TGO to detect changes in the level of neutron emissions at the Martian surface, finding a reduction in neutrons at the Candor Chaos region of the Valles Marineris that indicates a large amount of hydrogen, suggesting the material below the surface contains about 40 per cent water.

OB
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,770
4,704
✟349,352.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Tucker is a sciencey talking head used on a number of Australian channels as a commentator/reporter/explainer on astrophysical/cosmological stuff.

As far as I know he has no direct involvement with the EU probe.

OB
Why would a right wing nutjob news service such as SkyNews even bother to report on science since it has nothing to do with blaming leftists for everything such as the sky falling down.
One of the reader's comments shares a similar opinion.
Interesting Story , however the quality of this information is degraded when it comes from Sky news it makes you wonder why a right wing news outlet would have any interest in non fiction stories.
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Why would a right wing nutjob news service such as SkyNews even bother to report on science since it has nothing to do with blaming leftists for everything such as the sky falling down.
One of the reader's comments shares a similar opinion.

Dunno. I'm no Sky News fan. Their product is 10% News and 90% opinion by right wing shockjock wannabees often using material photocopied directly from the Fox playbook.

OB
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,049
2,232
✟210,340.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Fine-Resolution Epithermal Neutron Detector (FREND):
.. only good to depths of 1 m!!!
Surface ice .. at best.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Without valid detector evidence data?
Why?

Since the detector only operates to a depth of 1 metre we can't discount the possibility that the actual 'water' depth could exceed 1 metre.

I may have misunderstood you, but I had the impression that you were discounting the possibility of 'water' below 1 metre when you suggested it was 'surface ice...at best'.
Surface ice .. at best.

OB
 
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,049
2,232
✟210,340.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Since the detector only operates to a depth of 1 metre we can't discount the possibility that the actual 'water' depth could exceed 1 metre.
'Possibilities'? .. They're just 'opinions', right?
The truth however, is: 'don't know'.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0