Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
More evidence the shroud of Turin is ancient - around 2000 years old.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whyayeman" data-source="post: 77013968" data-attributes="member: 415320"><p>'Some kind of radiation from within' is what people want it to be: that is, a miraculous event. Such a phenomenon is beyond the scope of the physical sciences, of course, so believers will never be impressed with scientific enquiries which do not confirm their belief. Interestingly, there is always a deal of acceptance of the science which does not rule out the necessary dating.</p><p></p><p>The dirt on the shroud, along with the evidence that the material was from the First Century is circumstantial evidence; even if shown beyond doubt to be true it does not come near to a proof that the shroud was ever anywhere near the corpse of Christ.</p><p></p><p>It is, I think, an unsolvable puzzle. For the faithful proof is superfluous; for the rest of us, interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whyayeman, post: 77013968, member: 415320"] 'Some kind of radiation from within' is what people want it to be: that is, a miraculous event. Such a phenomenon is beyond the scope of the physical sciences, of course, so believers will never be impressed with scientific enquiries which do not confirm their belief. Interestingly, there is always a deal of acceptance of the science which does not rule out the necessary dating. The dirt on the shroud, along with the evidence that the material was from the First Century is circumstantial evidence; even if shown beyond doubt to be true it does not come near to a proof that the shroud was ever anywhere near the corpse of Christ. It is, I think, an unsolvable puzzle. For the faithful proof is superfluous; for the rest of us, interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
More evidence the shroud of Turin is ancient - around 2000 years old.
Top
Bottom