I posted about my mom and her (and her church's) false prophesies, which are always quickly forgotten about (by them at least).
Several posters spoke of judging each prophesy seperately as its own entity. I almost got the impression that prophets can make mistakes in their prophesies (i.e. too close to the subject) and that is okay. They're forgiven and we should continue to trust them.
However, I noticed at the top of the page under the wof forum 'Dad' Hagin's (and Kenneth Copeland's really) prophesies for '94, '95 and '96 (well a small portion of them anyways) which got me thinking about false prophesies. These particular prophesies are consuming some of my family members right now.
Everything I read in the Bible about false prophesies and the prophets who give the prophesies is pretty harsh.
"But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded him to say, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, must be put to death."
21 You may say to yourselves, "How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the LORD ?" 22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him."
So, why such a liberal attitude about prophets and their 'mistakes'? Does anybody else, like me, think that if somebody prophesies something 'divinely' given to them and it does not come true that they are not really in touch with God.
This is something that really bothers me. Possibly because my family is on overdrive right with me sharing the 'gorier' portions of the 1995/1996 prophesies (hoping to scare me back perhaps???). Personally, I hope the Lord comes back but whether it is next year or fifty years from now I'll be ready.
Several posters spoke of judging each prophesy seperately as its own entity. I almost got the impression that prophets can make mistakes in their prophesies (i.e. too close to the subject) and that is okay. They're forgiven and we should continue to trust them.
However, I noticed at the top of the page under the wof forum 'Dad' Hagin's (and Kenneth Copeland's really) prophesies for '94, '95 and '96 (well a small portion of them anyways) which got me thinking about false prophesies. These particular prophesies are consuming some of my family members right now.
Everything I read in the Bible about false prophesies and the prophets who give the prophesies is pretty harsh.
"But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded him to say, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, must be put to death."
21 You may say to yourselves, "How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the LORD ?" 22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him."
So, why such a liberal attitude about prophets and their 'mistakes'? Does anybody else, like me, think that if somebody prophesies something 'divinely' given to them and it does not come true that they are not really in touch with God.
This is something that really bothers me. Possibly because my family is on overdrive right with me sharing the 'gorier' portions of the 1995/1996 prophesies (hoping to scare me back perhaps???). Personally, I hope the Lord comes back but whether it is next year or fifty years from now I'll be ready.