• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Moralities

WatersMoon110

To See with Eyes Unclouded by Hate
May 30, 2007
4,738
266
42
Ohio
✟28,755.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I think that moral theories develop when a given group of people has a difficult problem among its members. They find a solution to the problem, and all of them believe it to be the only solution to that problem. So, when they hear about another group with the same issue, they tell their solution. Eventually, everyone in the area just begins to believe that the problem is solved with their solution - and in enough generations everyone starts to believe that that solution is the only "moral" way to solve that problem.

Did that make sense? *wink*
 
Upvote 0

Verv

Senior Veteran
Apr 17, 2005
7,278
673
Gyeonggido
✟48,571.00
Country
Korea, Republic Of
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
(3) Religious moral code: the notion of not necessarily following morals that come to you from individual being prioritized and not even the group, but following a moral code simply because you think it is the most virtuous and Holy way to do it.
 
Upvote 0

TeddyKGB

A dude playin' a dude disgused as another dude
Jul 18, 2005
6,495
455
48
Deep underground
✟9,013.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
(3) Religious moral code: the notion of not necessarily following morals that come to you from individual being prioritized and not even the group, but following a moral code simply because you think it is the most virtuous and Holy way to do it.
What about the part where God commands it?
 
Upvote 0

Deadbolt

Mocker and Scoffer
Jul 19, 2007
1,019
54
40
South beloit, IL
✟23,955.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
How about a libertarian basis: a morality which mandates the minimum neccessary to allow each person to freely exercise their desires?

I wouldn't subscribe to it, but it would be somewhat consistent.
It would be a good norm. Certainly people could be more benevolent should they desire but no one should think less of them for not doing so. And so long as nobody brings harm to another, there should be no basis for stigmatization or societal constraint.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,429
7,166
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟426,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
How many different moral codes can you conceive of? I
One of my favorite topics. Not sure if this is what you mean. The traditional classification of how we judge the morality of an action is as follows:

1) Consequentialism. The rightness or wrongness of an act is determined by its consequences. The best known type of consequentialist ethic is utilitarianism. Which states that a morally right action produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This is what you refer to as a collectivist ethic. The obvious problem is that what is best for the greatest number may not be good at all for an individual or a smaller group.

2) Deontology. Morality is determined by rules. The principle of reciprocity would be one of these rules. Following the social contract is another subtype. Religious ethics usually are deontologic, because morality is determined by obeying divine commands. The problem with rule-based ethics is that there is usually little guidance on what to do when rules conflict with one another.

3) Natural law ethic. There is a set of ethical principles that is an intrinsic part of the natural world, and is universally valid. All actions are judged based on their conformity with this natural law. This was greatly developed by Thomas Aquinas and is a major part of Catholic ethical doctrine.

4) Casuistry. The morality of actions must be judged on a case-by-case basis. Has gotten a bad rap as being relativistic or situational. But in the real world, with human affairs being as convoluted as they can be, it's the only practical approach.
 
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
39
Oxford, UK
✟39,693.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
More of an academic topic...

How does morality develop? How many different moral codes can you conceive of? I'll start off...

1)Individualistic. Primary motive-the good of the person.

2)Collectivist. Primary motive-the good of the group

Egoistic moral code. Primary motive: The good of the agent.
Divine moral code. Primary motive: The service of a divine being.

Delicious moral code. Primary motive: The accumulation and liberal application of high-quality jam.
 
Upvote 0