Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Montana students, teachers blast bill that would limit science education to ‘scientific fact’
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="essentialsaltes" data-source="post: 77130231" data-attributes="member: 294566"><p>I almost posted about this. But the truth is that I've had to dial back my outrage-o-meter. If (as in this case) <em><strong>one</strong></em> legislator introduces a nutty bill, that is not newsworthy. If it survives a committee and may actually be voted on, then it starts to be newsworthy.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The most potent argument is spelled out in the last line of OP, and Bradskii in #4. </p><p></p><p>The law starts from an incorrect definition of scientific theory; consequently, the law is either pointless (nobody teaches that kind of strawman 'theory' in science class, so it would have no effect) or harmful (it really would ban all scientific theories).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="essentialsaltes, post: 77130231, member: 294566"] I almost posted about this. But the truth is that I've had to dial back my outrage-o-meter. If (as in this case) [I][B]one[/B][/I] legislator introduces a nutty bill, that is not newsworthy. If it survives a committee and may actually be voted on, then it starts to be newsworthy. The most potent argument is spelled out in the last line of OP, and Bradskii in #4. The law starts from an incorrect definition of scientific theory; consequently, the law is either pointless (nobody teaches that kind of strawman 'theory' in science class, so it would have no effect) or harmful (it really would ban all scientific theories). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Montana students, teachers blast bill that would limit science education to ‘scientific fact’
Top
Bottom