Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Mont. Woman Arrested for Damaging Jesus 'inappropriate content' Art in Colo.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EdwinWillers" data-source="post: 55882233" data-attributes="member: 256061"><p>I wasn't suggesting - I was asking - asking you 'what do ya do?' And you respond in support of creating prurient ["appealing to or arousing inappropriate sexual desire"] <em>Christian</em> art as a proper means of expressing one's counter opinion to blasphemy.</p><p> </p><p>"Sure, why not?"</p><p> </p><p>Two choices - decry an outrageously disgusting and blasphemous piece of garbage by some 'artist' whose mind is in the depths of the sewer from which his 'art' (opinion) originates; or decry some woman for wrongly defacing his blasphemous sewage. And how ironic that both are considered 'blasphemy' - only one however is tolerated while the other isn't.</p><p> </p><p>Two people. Two opinions. One choice made. </p><p> </p><p>Wesley and Whitefield must <em>really</em> be proud...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EdwinWillers, post: 55882233, member: 256061"] I wasn't suggesting - I was asking - asking you 'what do ya do?' And you respond in support of creating prurient ["appealing to or arousing inappropriate sexual desire"] [I]Christian[/I] art as a proper means of expressing one's counter opinion to blasphemy. "Sure, why not?" Two choices - decry an outrageously disgusting and blasphemous piece of garbage by some 'artist' whose mind is in the depths of the sewer from which his 'art' (opinion) originates; or decry some woman for wrongly defacing his blasphemous sewage. And how ironic that both are considered 'blasphemy' - only one however is tolerated while the other isn't. Two people. Two opinions. One choice made. Wesley and Whitefield must [I]really[/I] be proud... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Mont. Woman Arrested for Damaging Jesus 'inappropriate content' Art in Colo.
Top
Bottom