- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Great, always nice when an open minded person stops by. Cheers. I'll miss the content..
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Great, always nice when an open minded person stops by. Cheers. I'll miss the content..Thank you but I have read enough, we will not be discussing anything again, may your God bless you and keep you.
I don't do bad poetry.Was your bad poetry worth posting?
No, why would I be able to do that?[/quote]I have made no "bizarre claims" about the future. Can you tell us when the Rapture will come, or not?
No, so called science that pretends to overrule creation, and deal in an unknown state, that it knows nothing about. As for knowledge of the present, and laws, that is science, and both good and bad. Sinful men use knowledge in sinful ways. No news there. Only to those that think they are good, maybe.The problem is you do not rant against nukes in particular, you rant against science and technology in general. This while you benefit from its fruits and thus the fruits of science.
I guess so.I guess that explains homosexuals who are practicing Christians. ...
Genesis is not by laws. It is history, and also full of useful things that happened to others, that apply right now. It is also about Jesus coming one day, and the sacrifice of the Lamb, etc. Nothing whatsoever to do with silly by laws.Wow, I actually agree with you, dad. Why then do you take Genesis, which is a prime example of the type of story-book writing you just described and insist it is a literal history?
You use youtube as evidence? That's not peer-review materiel. I rather read than watch something when it comes to evidence.The Bible doesn't seem so special now, does it?
You should see their pictures!You use youtube as evidence? That's not peer-review materiel. I rather read than watch something when it comes to evidence.
Perhaps if you're such an expert on Bible translations, you can tell me the one that is correct?And then there are those who use willful ignorance and a poorly translated version of The Bible as illustrations.
I vote for none of the above.Perhaps if you're such an expert on Bible translations, you can tell me the one that is correct?
Anyone can do that.I vote for none of the above.
Including the voters?It is simple logic. They can't all be right but they can all be wrong.
You got it backward. People like you who think they are God try to overrule what science tells us about nature, with your false interpretations of scripture. That is why I am going to start calling your interpretation of the Bible "so-called scripture," from now on. Thanks for that idea, btw.No, so called science that pretends to overrule creation, and deal in an unknown state, that it knows nothing about. As for knowledge of the present, and laws, that is science, and both good and bad. Sinful men use knowledge in sinful ways. No news there. Only to those that think they are good, maybe.
So, how do you know which parts of the Bible are "silly" and which are not? Do you just chose what you like and say its God's Word and then call the rest "silly" and ignore it?Genesis is not by laws. It is history, and also full of useful things that happened to others, that apply right now. It is also about Jesus coming one day, and the sacrifice of the Lamb, etc. Nothing whatsoever to do with silly by laws.
So that is, what, a vote for no inspiration at all?I vote for none of the above.
I agree. G-d didn't inspire them. Also, how old are you? ..satin in hill?? If you are over 10, it almost looks like a parody?They were inspired by satin in hill, not by G-d, when they butchered the original scripture.
Now now, don't make lying insane claims.You got it backward. People like you who think they are God....
try to overrule what science tells us about nature, with your false interpretations of scripture.
Calling the new heavens so called new heavens, and the flood a so called flood, and Adam, a so called man, and Eden a so called place, etc is childish, and ignorant of the facts.That is why I am going to start calling your interpretation of the Bible "so-called scripture," from now on. Thanks for that idea, btw.
The monor by-laws of the Jews, if applied to today as actual rules to live by, are silly, just as all out of context renderings of true meanings are silly.So, how do you know which parts of the Bible are "silly" and which are not? Do you just chose what you like and say its God's Word and then call the rest "silly" and ignore it?
What about, "Pluto is our 9th planet!"A lying insane claim would be "yec is true".
No. To claim anything else is to put on false airs. You don't know. Science doesn't know. It is as simple as looking to future universe, you don't know what it will be like. Face it. Claiming it is insane to believe a known God, for no reason that you know, is just not right.A lying insane claim would be "yec is true".
I am 9 in current state years. In past state, I aged much faster back then.I agree. G-d didn't inspire them. Also, how old are you? ..satin in hill?? If you are over 10, it almost looks like a parody?
What about, "Pluto is our 9th planet!"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?