- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You said eveything in the bible is literal truth; the bible literally says geocentricism is true, though it is scientifically proven not to be true, regardless of whatthe bible literally states. You believe in contradictory realities, a sign of delusion.
How would you know if it was or not?? I mean really? The bible says God is moving here one day forever. How could anything be MORE central??That makes no sense at all.
The earth was never the center of the universe.
The bible also doesn't say anything about alot of things we can observe to be true.
They could deal in the here and now, and pretend to also deal in the future. Like yours.How could your arguments contain less substance or support?
No arguments on your explanation of Luke and Matthew, except that Jesus was born of an earthly mother. Are women exempt from the sin nature?Had Jesus been born of an earthly father (Joseph), then He too would carry what we call the sin nature, and He therefore would not be qualified to be the Saviour of mankind, as He too, would be in need of a Saviour.
The messiah in them is.No arguments on your explanation of Luke and Matthew, except that Jesus was born of an earthly mother. Are women exempt from the sin nature?
The earth may not be geocentric, but it is certainly geoprominent.That makes no sense at all.
The earth was never the center of the universe.
No -- with the exception of Eve, every woman was made from the seed of the man.Are women exempt from the sin nature?
So I would be right to conclude that since Jesus had a mortal mother that he also carried the primal sin?No -- with the exception of Eve, every woman was made from the seed of the man.
No -- it can only be transferred via the seed of the man.So I would be right to conclude that since Jesus had a mortal mother that he also carried the primal sin?
so when scientists find a way to make a baby from two female eggs that baby wont have sin?
Yes. In the Greek Bible: Προπατορικό αμάρτημα = Original sin. I used the word primal as I felt it suited the circumstance better; Since it was not the original sin (Lucifer's revolt is the original sin). Adam and Eve's sin is the primal sin since it is Man's first sin.No -- it can only be transferred via the seed of the man.
(I like that term primal sin -- did you make that up?)
No -- it can only be transferred via the seed of the man.
No -- it can only be transferred via the seed of the man.
(I like that term primal sin -- did you make that up?)
Well, it should be medieval; as this is what we call a timeless truth.Hmm, this sounds suspiciously like medieval...
Sounds like medieval science got in there and gummed up the theology -- (as usual).... it was thought that the male seed contained the emergent embryo and the female only was a receptacle the embryo grew in.
No.Is that what you are saying?
Yet they are born with the sin nature, so there must be something more to this than just Y chromosomes?If it is only transferred via the seed of the man, then it must be contained in the Y chromosome, since that is the only male-specific part of his seed. But if that were the case, then women would not have that "primal sin" since they do not possess a Y chromosome.
Yet they are born with the sin nature, so there must be something more to this than just Y chromosomes?
Something [myopic] science can't see?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?