Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Minnesota lieutenant governor Tina Smith tapped to replace Al Franken in Senate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark46" data-source="post: 72094540" data-attributes="member: 257078"><p>Yup, Trump's position that no one in his campaign, his transition or his WH had ANY meetings with the Russians has been upheld.</p><p></p><p>How many folks have been documented to having met with Russians?</p><p>How many are under indictment. How many more when all of Flynn's information is fully utilized? How many lied to Congress, to the FBI, to Mueller? And why?</p><p></p><p>If all you are referring to is Donald Trump being convicted of collusion with the Russians, that was never possible. There is no such crime. Whether Trump's actions are impeachable is up to the 2019 Congress.</p><p>The president will not be indicted with regard to any crime. I suppose that is all he really cares about. He can pardon his family if they are indicted and convicted.</p><p></p><p>And Trump will not be indicted for obstruction. Many have testified that the proceedings against Flynn and others all proceeded normally. Conspiring to obstruct may be an impeachable offense. Obviously, Trump had every right to fire Cuomy. Firing the Special Counsel, on the other hand, would likely get him impeached, even by Republicans.</p><p></p><p>IN THE MEANTIME</p><p>There is a lot, lot more to the scope of Mueller's investigations than whether the president is guilty of collusion.</p><p></p><p>AS AN ASIDE</p><p>Mueller's investigations COULD be expended to include the case of Clinton's emails. Essentially, that is up to the Republicans.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark46, post: 72094540, member: 257078"] Yup, Trump's position that no one in his campaign, his transition or his WH had ANY meetings with the Russians has been upheld. How many folks have been documented to having met with Russians? How many are under indictment. How many more when all of Flynn's information is fully utilized? How many lied to Congress, to the FBI, to Mueller? And why? If all you are referring to is Donald Trump being convicted of collusion with the Russians, that was never possible. There is no such crime. Whether Trump's actions are impeachable is up to the 2019 Congress. The president will not be indicted with regard to any crime. I suppose that is all he really cares about. He can pardon his family if they are indicted and convicted. And Trump will not be indicted for obstruction. Many have testified that the proceedings against Flynn and others all proceeded normally. Conspiring to obstruct may be an impeachable offense. Obviously, Trump had every right to fire Cuomy. Firing the Special Counsel, on the other hand, would likely get him impeached, even by Republicans. IN THE MEANTIME There is a lot, lot more to the scope of Mueller's investigations than whether the president is guilty of collusion. AS AN ASIDE Mueller's investigations COULD be expended to include the case of Clinton's emails. Essentially, that is up to the Republicans. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Minnesota lieutenant governor Tina Smith tapped to replace Al Franken in Senate
Top
Bottom