Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
micro vs macro evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paulos23" data-source="post: 46247784" data-attributes="member: 105225"><p>It is in textbooks? Really? Because I haven't seen it used in scientific circles when talking about evolution.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Your talking about the same processes here. What your discribing as micro adds up to what your discribing as macro over time. The real question is if macro is not possible, what is the mechanism that stops it. That information hogwash doesn't fly because that would stop micro as well, and you already admitted that it happens, so that can't be true. (Besides, what is your definition of information?) Once you find that mechanism, then you will have something.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>They are not different process, and you have not shown that they are. You just relabeling process trying to pull a fast one.</p><p> </p><p>Besides, if macro evolution wasn't possible, why is there <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/" target="_blank">so much evidence for it</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paulos23, post: 46247784, member: 105225"] It is in textbooks? Really? Because I haven't seen it used in scientific circles when talking about evolution. Your talking about the same processes here. What your discribing as micro adds up to what your discribing as macro over time. The real question is if macro is not possible, what is the mechanism that stops it. That information hogwash doesn't fly because that would stop micro as well, and you already admitted that it happens, so that can't be true. (Besides, what is your definition of information?) Once you find that mechanism, then you will have something. They are not different process, and you have not shown that they are. You just relabeling process trying to pull a fast one. Besides, if macro evolution wasn't possible, why is there [URL="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/"]so much evidence for it[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
micro vs macro evolution
Top
Bottom