Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
maybe this peer review would help you with that:Just checking in... have the creos figured out that macro is just micro + time, yet? Or are they still on about croccoducks?
Great link! Thanks for posting.maybe this peer review would help you with that:
macro evolution is more than just repeated rounds of micro evolution:
Error - Cookies Turned Off
Great link! Thanks for posting.
Did you read it? Do you finally accept macroevolution, then.
Lol. You didn’t read it... (I knew that alreadysir I post it for your benefit, to prove your concept wrong "that macro evolution is just repeated rounds of micro evolution."
and it's not.
so post refuted.
now we can move on.
thanks for this debate.
Your linked paper seeks to demonstrate two inter-dependent things:sir I post it for your benefit, to prove your concept wrong "that macro evolution is just repeated rounds of micro evolution."
and it's not.
so post refuted.
now we can move on.
thanks for this debate.
LOL ... I been saying that years before you ever joined.See there, you did learn something!
Nope.... that macoevolution happens.
There are no facts presented in this post as I have posted in mine. Just attacking my viewpoint does not disqualify it.
Taxonomy has a natural barrier to evolution this is why evolutionist have moved the goal posts and decided to use phylogeny instead.
I know that , you already said that. The reason why I sent the article is it disproves what you said. These are your citations. Macroevolution is not observed, and thus no hypothesis can be tested with no observation. This it absolutely can't be science. At least until observation is made.Lol. You didn’t read it... (I knew that already).
Macro = micro + time, is bedrock ToE. As with anything in science, there are observed nuances and exceptions. The article you posted is a solid article, and comports with all other observed data... that macoevolution happens.
*cough* Homo habilis *cough*No.Different genuses.
Yes sir phylogeny as I have posted via peer review in previous posts was created as an alternative to taxonomy when discussing evolution
What about Homo habilis?*cough* Homo habilis *cough*
Sorry AV, I must have missed that one.
According to the text, which is all we have, I'd say yes.... "You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures" doesn't mean some of the living creatures does it?
No.According to the text, which is all we have, I'd say yes.... "You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures" doesn't mean some of the living creatures does it?
By no means a common interpretation.What about Homo habilis?
According to your link, some think it's mislabeled.
No.
What's the point?
Only the top genera boarded the Ark.
Domestic dogs, for example, wouldn't be aboard.
(Unless, of course, God wanted them there.)
do you think that a robot that is identical to a penguin can evolve naturally?So you think a theory is a 'belief.'
And you think a self-replicating robot penguin disproves evolution, even though there is no such thing and even if there was, it would not be a living thing.
Are you actually just a bot of some kind?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?