Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Micheal's solar model
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 72466665" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>You have misrepresented the neutrino predictions of Thornhill's model, you misrepresented the statements and papers of Priest, Somov, Dungey, Crawford, Bruce, Peratt, Alfven, Scott, Findlay and everyone else that I can think of, so it should be no surprise that you'd intentionally misrepresent my models, my papers, and my statements too. Have you no shame at all?</p><p></p><p>Wow. You obviously have *no clue* what you're even talking about on a *very* wide range of topics, including electrical discharges in plasma, magnetic reconnection, solar models (plural), SN1A data, or pretty much any discussion that you get involved in.</p><p></p><p>Go pester someone else for awhile. I'm tired of your utter lack of ethics and your blatant cyberstalking campaign. Nothing that you say is true, and you intentionally misrepresent my statements and my work, along with the work of everyone else I've seen you discuss.. That is just *so* unethical it's not even funny.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 72466665, member: 627"] You have misrepresented the neutrino predictions of Thornhill's model, you misrepresented the statements and papers of Priest, Somov, Dungey, Crawford, Bruce, Peratt, Alfven, Scott, Findlay and everyone else that I can think of, so it should be no surprise that you'd intentionally misrepresent my models, my papers, and my statements too. Have you no shame at all? Wow. You obviously have *no clue* what you're even talking about on a *very* wide range of topics, including electrical discharges in plasma, magnetic reconnection, solar models (plural), SN1A data, or pretty much any discussion that you get involved in. Go pester someone else for awhile. I'm tired of your utter lack of ethics and your blatant cyberstalking campaign. Nothing that you say is true, and you intentionally misrepresent my statements and my work, along with the work of everyone else I've seen you discuss.. That is just *so* unethical it's not even funny. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Micheal's solar model
Top
Bottom