Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Micheal's solar model
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 72462052" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>Oy Vey. You missed the point of the paper as usual. We aren't suggesting that the light from the neutron star somehow powers the whole sun. If anything the rotational energy of the neutron star is simply inducing currents near the surface of the neutron star's crust, and it is generating fusion near the core. It's still ultimately a fusion driven model RC.</p><p></p><p>There's simply no point in going through your silly stawman arguments one by one because we didn't make the claim that you're accusing us of in the first place. You made that up, just like you made up the whole 'no neutrino' nonsense.</p><p></p><p>You clearly have no idea what you're talking about with respect to this paper either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 72462052, member: 627"] Oy Vey. You missed the point of the paper as usual. We aren't suggesting that the light from the neutron star somehow powers the whole sun. If anything the rotational energy of the neutron star is simply inducing currents near the surface of the neutron star's crust, and it is generating fusion near the core. It's still ultimately a fusion driven model RC. There's simply no point in going through your silly stawman arguments one by one because we didn't make the claim that you're accusing us of in the first place. You made that up, just like you made up the whole 'no neutrino' nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about with respect to this paper either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Micheal's solar model
Top
Bottom