Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
McConnell Sets Plans For Full Repeal As Murkowski and Capito Stand In The Way
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rion" data-source="post: 71528095" data-attributes="member: 166965"><p>My idea was to keep them as it'd provide enough votes to get rid of the rest of the crap, and then let them have a chance to move on to more pressing matters like tax reform before returning to it later. That's just me armchairing, though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a terrible analogy. To begin with, there is a difference between the inherent powers of the state and what is allowed by the federal government via the constitution. Secondly, the insurance is only required in order to protect other drivers, hence the ability to purchase liability only. Finally, driving is optional and/or a privilege. Insurance is required to be in good standing with the US Government or you are fined. </p><p></p><p>Here's a piece that probably explains it better than I do:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/04/health_insurance_mandates_vs_a.html" target="_blank">Blog: Health insurance mandates vs. Auto liability requirements - a false analogy</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rion, post: 71528095, member: 166965"] My idea was to keep them as it'd provide enough votes to get rid of the rest of the crap, and then let them have a chance to move on to more pressing matters like tax reform before returning to it later. That's just me armchairing, though. That's a terrible analogy. To begin with, there is a difference between the inherent powers of the state and what is allowed by the federal government via the constitution. Secondly, the insurance is only required in order to protect other drivers, hence the ability to purchase liability only. Finally, driving is optional and/or a privilege. Insurance is required to be in good standing with the US Government or you are fined. Here's a piece that probably explains it better than I do: [URL="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/04/health_insurance_mandates_vs_a.html"]Blog: Health insurance mandates vs. Auto liability requirements - a false analogy[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
McConnell Sets Plans For Full Repeal As Murkowski and Capito Stand In The Way
Top
Bottom