Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
McConnell says he doesn't have enough votes to block witnesses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bobber" data-source="post: 74676539" data-attributes="member: 25895"><p>Because there's also a bigger picture that needs to be considered. I agree most of the mob really might not have the capacity to understand this but the question is.....<u>EVEN IF what Bolton said is true.....does even that amount to an Impeachable offence? </u>If the feeling is that it is not then why be wasting time with all this....why not get it over? </p><p></p><p>Mark my words if it goes down this road the issue would have to be addressed....is it an impeachable offence? I think most already agree it would not. So why not cut out the unnecessary wasting the tax payers time and money over a given? </p><p></p><p>I'm not a legal expert and perhaps couldn't work this way....but if it goes down this road I wonder before calling witnesses perhaps a vote should be brought forth to consider FIRST if Trump through clear documentation linked money to exactly having Biden investigated then FIRST is that an impeachable offence? Answering that FIRST before calling witnesses can do away with the purpose of even doing so. I think that's really the mindset of the majority of Senators now anyway.....so why have witnesses? So there's a perfectly just reason NOT to bring forth more witnesses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bobber, post: 74676539, member: 25895"] Because there's also a bigger picture that needs to be considered. I agree most of the mob really might not have the capacity to understand this but the question is.....[U]EVEN IF what Bolton said is true.....does even that amount to an Impeachable offence? [/U]If the feeling is that it is not then why be wasting time with all this....why not get it over? Mark my words if it goes down this road the issue would have to be addressed....is it an impeachable offence? I think most already agree it would not. So why not cut out the unnecessary wasting the tax payers time and money over a given? I'm not a legal expert and perhaps couldn't work this way....but if it goes down this road I wonder before calling witnesses perhaps a vote should be brought forth to consider FIRST if Trump through clear documentation linked money to exactly having Biden investigated then FIRST is that an impeachable offence? Answering that FIRST before calling witnesses can do away with the purpose of even doing so. I think that's really the mindset of the majority of Senators now anyway.....so why have witnesses? So there's a perfectly just reason NOT to bring forth more witnesses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
McConnell says he doesn't have enough votes to block witnesses
Top
Bottom