Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Matt Damon and Looney Liberal Paranoia About Creationists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NotreDame" data-source="post: 48630943" data-attributes="member: 212558"><p>Since you rely upon this analogy, in more than one post, to more than one poster, it needs to be addressed, as it is terribly flawed. </p><p> </p><p>There are only so many ways in which everything we see came into existence. A.) God created it B.) God did not create it and came about by naturalistic means C). Aliens. An atheist is someone who does not believe in a higher power and consequently, this automatically excludes option A). Meaning we now have a 50/50 chance the atheist believes in either B or C, after all there are only two options. </p><p> </p><p>This is vastly different from belonging to a large organization, such as Assembly of God, or one of its churches, which has various creeds, beliefs, and statements, and asserting an individual member of the church believes or probably believes in a specific tenet, tenet X. </p><p> </p><p>Your examples are non-parallel and JamesWright is correct in stating your argument is flawed, was flawed, and remains flawed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NotreDame, post: 48630943, member: 212558"] Since you rely upon this analogy, in more than one post, to more than one poster, it needs to be addressed, as it is terribly flawed. There are only so many ways in which everything we see came into existence. A.) God created it B.) God did not create it and came about by naturalistic means C). Aliens. An atheist is someone who does not believe in a higher power and consequently, this automatically excludes option A). Meaning we now have a 50/50 chance the atheist believes in either B or C, after all there are only two options. This is vastly different from belonging to a large organization, such as Assembly of God, or one of its churches, which has various creeds, beliefs, and statements, and asserting an individual member of the church believes or probably believes in a specific tenet, tenet X. Your examples are non-parallel and JamesWright is correct in stating your argument is flawed, was flawed, and remains flawed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Matt Damon and Looney Liberal Paranoia About Creationists
Top
Bottom