Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Exactly. It's plainly obvious that none of those things you claimed were in scripture are actually in scripture.Of course not.
Yes it does. What's it to you?
We covered that already. They are working on trying to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics (as I understand it), and they decided to name the theory they're hoping to develop "the theory of everything".Yes or no:
Are scientists working on a theory of everything?
Exactly. It's plainly obvious that none of those things you claimed were in scripture are actually in scripture.
Nothing.
But it should be to you.
After all, if scientists are working on a theory of everything then, according to your words, scientists are working on nothing.
Since ... you know ... something that answers everything answers nothing.
Not by name -- right?
That's how abortion got through.
Scientists changed "child in the womb" to "fetus."
More accurately it's "under no circumstances whatsoever is AV's interpretation of the Bible to be contradicted".After all: Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.
That's a hilarious way to admit it's not in there.Not by name -- right?
More accurately it's "under no circumstances whatsoever is AV's interpretation of the Bible to be contradicted".
And as we've seen, at least some of what he claims is in the Bible isn't actually in there, and some of his interpretations are really unique and not shared by most Christians.
Phew!Oh, believe me... WE KNOW.
We covered that already.
They are working on trying to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics (as I understand it), and they decided to name the theory they're hoping to develop "the theory of everything".
So to reiterate, do you understand the difference between an idea being researched and the colloquial label given to that idea?
More accurately it's "under no circumstances whatsoever is AV's interpretation of the Bible to be contradicted".
And as we've seen, at least some of what he claims is in the Bible isn't actually in there, and some of his interpretations are really unique and not shared by most Christians.
That's a hilarious way to admit it's not in there.
That's neat.
Scientists working on something that other scientists suspect is an impossibility.
Doesn't surprise me at all.
Maybe they suspect it's an impossibility as well, but are working on it because they want the money?
Then we did cover it after all!Yes, I know.
Then hopefully you understand that "the theory of everything" does't actually mean it explains absolutely everything. It doesn't explain why my dog acts the way she does for example.Yes.
It does? How?In this case though, they labeled something colloquially that has a negative connotation attached to it.
We do. In science (and keep in mind that's the context here) "God did that" can't be an explanation because it's not testable. I'm pretty sure we've gone over that before.If you want to believe that "God did it" explains nothing because it explains everything, then you should apply that philosophy to your science as well.
In what case, the theory of everything? Why would you say that when none of us know what it would even look like?But in this case, science can take a hike, can't it?
I remember, once upon a time, you said that you held scientists to a higher degree than anyone else. That was just an out and out lie, wasn't it?
Nope.
I make a distinction between scientists who are called to be scientists ... and hierlings.
No thanks.Let's see yours.
The last survey of views on evolution in the developed world I saw showed that a large majority of people are just fine with it. Pairing that data with the number of Christians in those countries shows that most Christians don't share your "science can take a hike" views.Fastest Pew research I've seen in a long time.
Do you have a percentage on that?
So as a Christian I can believe God did something, but I can't turn that into a scientific explanation for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?