Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yep, the quote from Calvin is good, but the quote from Ezekiel is even better:JeffreyLloyd said:And even the "great" Protestant Reformers did as well. It wasn't until after their death this crazy idea about the Mary's virginity take place.
So the children after Christ were then adopted??......
RaptureTicketHolder said:..I dont see how Protestants ignore Mary. It is wise to say that if you dont agree with Catholic thought, ignorance is present? I dont think so...
nyj said:Yep, the quote from Calvin is good, but the quote from Ezekiel is even better:
Ezekiel 44:2
And the LORD said to me, "This gate shall be shut; it shall not be opened, and no man shall enter by it, because the LORD God of Israel has entered by it; therefore it shall be shut."
nyj said:They could have been cousins (adelphos translates to kin). They could have been children of Joseph's.
Oblio said:So... where, when, and most importantly why did this faith of our Fathers and the Apostles get distorted, diluted and finally denied ?
Who's records, what Church and at what timeframe was this info started?Oblio said:We know from historical records that they were older, and the Church records that they were children of Joseph who was much older than Mary and was entrusted with her care.
RaptureTicketHolder said:Who's records, what Church and at what timeframe was this info started?
A catholic record would indeed be biased as there would be much to loose if the actual records showed the timing to settle well with Mary having Children. Im not sure I would trust the catholic recording.
Is there any outside source?
Oblio said:We know from historical records that they were older, and the Church records that they were children of Joseph who was much older than Mary and was entrusted with her care.
Many times Galatians 1:19 is quoted, where Paul mentions "James, the Lord's brother", which is trotted out as "proof" that Mary had more children after Jesus.RaptureTicketHolder said:Who's records, what Church and at what timeframe was this info started?
If Joseph had grown children before he even married Mary, this strongly suggests he must have been married before. If he was free to take Mary as his wife, it likewise strongly suggests his previous wife, the mother of his grown children, was dead.RaptureTicketHolder said:Also, what suggests Joseph w/another wife?
Why am I not surprised?RaptureTicketHolder said:A catholic record would indeed be biased as there would be much to loose if the actual records showed the timing to settle well with Mary having Children. Im not sure I would trust the catholic recording.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?