• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Marcus Borg’s Neotraditional Christianity

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes

Joykins

free Crazy Liz!
Jul 14, 2005
15,720
1,181
55
Down in Mary's Land
✟44,390.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
jubilationtcornpone said:
It depends on what you mean by "immanent." If by that you mean "subjective," then it is unbiblical. The Bible clearly states that God existed before time, which means that his existence is not subjective.
Click to expand...

No, it does not mean subjective. It means all around us and everywhere. The whole universe being God-infused.

Moreover, You seem to be under the impression that Borg only claimed that God is immanent. He didn't. Borg also claimed that God does not exist "out there" -- that he has no independent ontological status. That is both false and unbiblical.
Click to expand...

I don't understand exactly the basis of the "out there" claim meaing that God "has no independent ontological status". In fact, I'm not sure at all that this claim is an accurate representation of what Borg believes.

My impression (from reading Borg) is that as a mystic he tends to favor or emphasize the immanent model of understanding God, but I don't recall him explicitly denying the transcendent. Borg's approach to these models of understanding God (both immanence/transcendence and all the--Biblical!-- metaphorical language such as Father, King, Judge, Lover, etc.) seems to be fairly utilitarian (e.g. "this will work for some people and it's Biblical and if it helps people get closer to God, great, but it might not work for many others (including me) so much for this reason).

He demonstrated no such thing. As I explictly said, God may be many things, but that does not mean that all descriptions of God are correct.
Click to expand...

He quoted a passage that clearly portrayed a Psalmist's perception of an immanent deity.

All descriptions of God are necessarily incomplete. If we were to fully comprehend God I believe we'd die on the spot from our minds being completely blown.
 
Upvote 0

jfer45

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
245
2
✟22,888.00
Faith
Christian

No. Borg's attributes both immanence and transcendence to God.
 
Upvote 0
J

jubilationtcornpone

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2005
796
79
57
Visit site
✟23,856.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
jfer45 said:
Again, Borg does see God as transcendent.
Click to expand...
Hey, Joykins is the one who said that Borg "describes an immanent rather than transcendent deity." I was just taking her word for it. If Borg does indeed teach a transcendent God, then either she was mistaken or Borg's stance has been inconsistent.

Moreover, Borg's concept of God is still incoherent and unbiblical, regardless of whether he teaches transcendence or not. I already posted a direct quote wherein Borg said that God does not exist "out there." Allow me to reproduce it for your own benefit:

"I realized that God does not refer to a supernatural being 'out there'... Rather God refers to the sacred at the center of existence, the holy mystery that is all around and within us." - Marcus Borg, Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time (San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1994), page 14.
​
Got must certainly IS a supernatural being 'out there'! The Bible clearly teaches that God created the world -- indeed, all things. This makes him supernatural and it means that his existence is not confined to within ourselves or our perceptions.

More about Borg's twisted concept of God can be found right here.
 
Upvote 0
J

jubilationtcornpone

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2005
796
79
57
Visit site
✟23,856.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
PaladinValer said:
To say God is not Substance is to deny the Trinity.

The Trinity is Three distinct Persons equally and eternally of the same One Substance.

The Nicene Creed uses the word homoousios. The Holy Spirit has spoken.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my questions, though. What does it mean to say that "God is Substance"? And if God is indeed Substance, how does this lead to Marcus Borg's conclusion that "God does not refer to a supernatural being 'out there'"?
 
Upvote 0

CaDan

I remember orange CF
Site Supporter
Jan 30, 2004
23,298
2,832
The Society of the Spectacle
✟134,677.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Tillich it is!
 
Upvote 0

Joykins

free Crazy Liz!
Jul 14, 2005
15,720
1,181
55
Down in Mary's Land
✟44,390.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
jubilationtcornpone said:
Hey, Joykins is the one who said that Borg "describes an immanent rather than transcendent deity." I was just taking her word for it. If Borg does indeed teach a transcendent God, then either she was mistaken or Borg's stance has been inconsistent.
Click to expand...

I was mistaken. My apologies.


The quote is a short quote from a book I've never read...BUT I would not say that this quote substantiates an assertion that Borg's concept of God is "confined to within ourselves or our perceptions."

What does "Immanuel" mean, after all?

Rather, if Borg affirms a transcendent AND immanent God, then he affirms the God of orthodox Christianity in those particulars.


More about Borg's twisted concept of God can be found right here.
Click to expand...

That article is more notable for its bias than its accuracy. The author has made no attempt to understand what Borg is trying to say, but is entirely focused on trying to argue with Borg's ideas (many of which he doesn't appear to understand).
 
Upvote 0

jfer45

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
245
2
✟22,888.00
Faith
Christian

That quote is taken out of context. Borg is referring to, what he believes, is the popular notion of God. Borg grew up in church which emphasized a God that is a person-like being out there and not here. He doesn't see God this way anymore, but rather affirms that God is "more than the universe" or more than the "here and now".
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Millions receive Scripture in their own language as Bible translation work accelerates
Replies
3
Views
162
Current News & Events (Articles Required)
RileyG
OSAS - I was wrong...again
Replies
59
Views
2K
General Theology
Guojing
G
Deliberate Altering of Scripture to Fit the Narrative
Replies
9
Views
445
Controversial Christian Theology
Indentured Servant
What is Calvinism and its beliefs?
Replies
14
Views
775
General Theology
BobRyan
NT Wright says marriage won’t exist in Heaven, but love will be transformed
Replies
24
Views
2K
General Theology
ViaCrucis
Menu
Log in
Register